Federal contractor · FARMERSVILLE, CA

VET CON SOUZA A JOINT VENTURE

VET CON SOUZA A JOINT VENTURE received $2.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 21 awards (−70% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $18.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($2.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.8M
New awards
21
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
J2MHSU7N5KL4
Small businessWoman-ownedVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 646KFY2018
  2. 0FY2019
  3. 202.9KFY2023
  4. 5.9MFY2024
  5. 9.3MFY2025
  6. 2.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 20 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$2.8M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Yuma County, AZ$102.8K3.7%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Yuma County, AZ· Construction & real property· May 21, 2024 – Mar 31, 2026· N6247324F4604
  2. Department of the Army· Sacramento County, CA· Construction & real property· Feb 12, 2026 – Feb 12, 2026· W911SA26FA066
  3. Department of the Army· Santa Clara County, CA· Construction & real property· Apr 23, 2026 – Apr 23, 2026· W911SA26FA148
  4. Department of the Army· Santa Clara County, CA· Construction & real property· Jun 12, 2026 – Jun 12, 2026· W911SA26FA210
  5. Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Construction & real property· Apr 30, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026· W911SA26FA156
  6. Department of the Army· Robertson County, TX· Construction & real property· May 20, 2026 – May 20, 2026· W911SA26FA169
  7. Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Construction & real property· Mar 17, 2026 – Mar 17, 2026· W911SA26FA104
  8. Department of the Army· Dallas County, TX· Construction & real property· Jun 5, 2026 – Jun 5, 2026· W911SA26FA192

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FRAZIER ENGINEERING, INC.$20.1M−89% in FY2026
    MELBOURNE, FL · 2 entities · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  2. JSR-ECC, LLC$11.6M−40% in FY2026
    SCHERTZ, TX · 2 entities · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  3. MILTON, FL · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.