Federal contractor · FAIRFAX, VA

W R SYSTEMS LTD.

W R SYSTEMS LTD. received $37.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 42 awards (−34% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $496.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($37.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$37.6M
New awards
42
Sole-source
11%
Single offer
4.4%
UEI
N5RJW5NX32Y1
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $39.9M in FY2026 together.

  1. W R SYSTEMS LTD.FAIRFAX, VA · Family page
    $37.6M
  2. W R SYSTEMS LTDNORFOLK, VA
    $2.3M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 53.2MFY2017
  2. 57.6MFY2018
  3. 51.6MFY2019
  4. 56.7MFY2020
  5. 46.8MFY2021
  6. 44.7MFY2022
  7. 50.4MFY2023
  8. 40.8MFY2024
  9. 57MFY2025
  10. 37.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 41 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$36M96%
  2. Research & development$1.5M4.0%
  3. Education & social services$158.8K0.4%

Where the work was performed

  1. United States$34.8K0.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition16%
    US 39% · $6M
  • Sole-source awards11%
    US 30% · $4.3M
  • Single-offer competitions4.4%
    US 8.8% · $1.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Fairfax city, VA· IT & telecom· Apr 26, 2019 – Dec 16, 2025· N0017819F3012
  2. Department of the Navy· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Aug 31, 2022 – May 29, 2026· N6523622F0700
  3. Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Jul 18, 2023 – Apr 13, 2026· N6523623F0486
  4. Department of the Navy· Fairfax city, VA· Professional services· Mar 26, 2025 – Jun 9, 2026· N0017825F3010
  5. Department of the Navy· Fairfax city, VA· Professional services· Sep 8, 2025 – Mar 25, 2026· N6523625F0412
  6. Department of the Navy· Fairfax city, VA· Professional services· Feb 18, 2025 – Jun 3, 2026· N6523625F0137
  7. Department of the Navy· Fairfax city, VA· Professional services· Mar 2, 2023 – Mar 31, 2026· N6523623F0183
  8. Department of the Navy· Fairfax city, VA· Professional services· May 1, 2024 – May 8, 2026· N6523624F0273

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.1M (5 subawards)

5 sub-recipients

  1. TAMPA, FL · 1 subaward
  2. VERNON HILLS, IL · 1 subaward
  3. QUAKERTOWN, PA · 1 subaward
  4. SAN JOSE, CA · 1 subaward
  5. KONNECT RF, LLC$70.5K6.6%
    BOYNTON BEACH, FL · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 2.8% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $38.4M paid out · $4.2M received
  • FY2022: $1.4M paid out · $90.7K received
  • FY2023: $3M paid out · $5M received
  • FY2024: $2M paid out · $764.5K received
  • FY2025: $1.7M paid out · $4.7M received
  • FY2026: $1.1M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

69 companies · $48.2M reported

  1. DALLAS, TX · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. BOHEMIA, NY · 6 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. TAMPA, FL · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $17.2M reported

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. ATLANTA, GA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ATLANTA, GA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 31 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WOODBRIDGE, VA · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HIGHBURY DEFENSE GROUP$122.1M−67% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CRL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$110.1M−11% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.