Federal contractor · LAKE FOREST, IL

W.W. GRAINGER, INC.

W.W. GRAINGER, INC. received $343.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 153,390 awards (−4.2% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.3B. Its largest customer was Federal Acquisition Service ($340.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$343.2M
New awards
153,390
Sole-source
0.1%
Single offer
0.1%
UEI
DBQGN324ULK3
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

8 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $343.2M in FY2026 together.

  1. W.W. GRAINGER, INC.LAKE FOREST, IL · Family page
    $343.2M
  2. $43.9K
  3. E & R INDUSTRIAL SALES INCSTERLING HEIGHTS, MI
    $0
  4. $0
  5. $0
  6. $0
  7. $0
  8. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 76MFY2017
  2. 108MFY2018
  3. 158MFY2019
  4. 224.2MFY2020
  5. 197.8MFY2021
  6. 209.8MFY2022
  7. 263.8MFY2023
  8. 319.7MFY2024
  9. 358.2MFY2025
  10. 343.2MFY2026
  11. 1.7MFY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 153,214 awards
  2. 17 awards
  3. 17 awards
  4. 11 awards
  5. 6 awards
  6. 7 awards
  7. U.S. Coast Guard$221.6K0.1%
    10 awards
  8. 32 awards
  9. 6 awards
  10. 5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$342.9M99.9%
  2. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$234.7K0.1%
  3. Construction & real property$43.4K0.0%
  4. IT & telecom$23.4K0.0%
  5. Health & medical$7,0020.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Lake County, IL$342M99.7%
  2. Erie County, PA$36.4K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.2%
    US 39% · $827.4K
  • Sole-source awards0.1%
    US 30% · $491K
  • Single-offer competitions0.1%
    US 8.7% · $336.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $85K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 4 awards
  2. Department of Homeland Security · 2 awards
  3. Department of Health and Human Services · 1 awards
  4. Department of Transportation · 1 awards
  5. Department of Defense · 13 awards

Largest awards

  1. Federal Acquisition Service· Lake County, IL· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 23, 2026 – Sep 23, 2026· 47QSCC26F76JE
  2. Federal Acquisition Service· Lake County, IL· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 31, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· 47QSCC26F6MSC
  3. Federal Acquisition Service· Lake County, IL· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 30, 2026 – Jul 30, 2026· 47QSCC26F5UCY
  4. Federal Acquisition Service· Lake County, IL· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 8, 2026 – Jul 8, 2026· 47QSCC26F5AWA
  5. Federal Acquisition Service· Lake County, IL· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 3, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· 47QSCC26F4QPB
  6. Federal Acquisition Service· Lake County, IL· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 17, 2026 – Mar 17, 2026· 47QSCC26F2TZF
  7. Federal Acquisition Service· Lake County, IL· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 4, 2026 – Mar 4, 2026· 47QSCC26F2HK4
  8. Federal Acquisition Service· Lake County, IL· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 4, 2025 – Dec 4, 2025· 47QSCC26F0H1E

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1M (12 subawards)

10 primes

  1. FAIRFAX, VA · 2 subawards
  2. SERCO INC$128.1K13%
    HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward
  3. PASCAGOULA, MS · 1 subaward
  4. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  5. SCRANTON, PA · 2 subawards
  6. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  7. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 1 subaward
  8. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward
  9. WOOD DALE, IL · 1 subaward
  10. NEW ORLEANS, LA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2.4M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.3M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $6.5M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $3.1M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

41 companies · $17.6M reported

  1. NEW ORLEANS, LA · 1 subaward
  2. FAIRFIELD, NJ · 43 subawards · Other miscellaneous manufacturing
  3. GROTON, CT · 24 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 143 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO., INC.$292.5M+2.7% in FY2026
    MELVILLE, NY · 5 entities · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Building material and supplies dealers
  2. WINSTON SALEM, NC · 3 entities · 0.7% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Building material and supplies dealers
  3. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.$11.5M+38% in FY2026
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 86 entities · 0.1% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Other electrical equipment and component manufacturingFederal Aviation Administration · Machinery, equipment, and supplies merchant wholesalers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of W.W. GRAINGER, INC. (8 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • W.W. Grainger, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$200K
6 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$560K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$80K
    9 reports
  2. 2024$80K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$200K
    6 reports
  4. 2026$200K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations10 reports
  2. Government issues8 reports
  3. Defense6 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE18 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES17 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. AxAdvocacy Government Relations$390K
    14 reports
  2. K&L GATES LLP$160K
    4 reports
  3. Clark Hill, PLC$10K
    1 reports
  4. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$0
    4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 6, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.