Federal contractor · CHICAGO, IL

WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY II, LLC

WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY II, LLC received $5.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−74% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $607.8M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($5.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$5.7M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
94%
UEI
N64NCQ58JL25
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

7 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $5.7M in FY2026 together.

  1. WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY II, LLCCHICAGO, IL · Family page
    $5.7M
  2. ARCHER WESTERN CONSTRUCTION LLCCHICAGO, IL
    $0
  3. ARCHER WESTERN CONTRACTORS, LLCATLANTA, GA
    $0
  4. WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANYCHICAGO, IL
    $0
  5. WALSH CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLCCHICAGO, IL
    $0
  6. WALSH GLOBAL, LLCCHICAGO, IL
    $0
  7. WALSH'DEMARIA JOINT VENTURE VCHICAGO, IL
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 46MFY2017
  2. 4.7MFY2018
  3. 114.2MFY2019
  4. 110.7MFY2020
  5. 24.4MFY2021
  6. 10.7MFY2022
  7. 205MFY2023
  8. 64.3MFY2024
  9. 22.2MFY2025
  10. 5.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs$5.3M94%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Army$348.7K6.2%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$5.7M99.9%
  2. Professional services$3,0000.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Dallas County, TX$5.3M94%
  2. Macomb County, MI$345.7K6.1%
  3. Cook County, IL$3,0000.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition94%
    US 39% · $5.3M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions94%
    US 8.7% · $5.3M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. CONSTRUCTION LONG TERM SPINAL CORD INJURY VAMC NORTH DALLAS, TX$215.7M
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Dallas County, TX· Construction & real property· Sep 22, 2023 – Sep 28, 2026· 36C10F23C0007
  2. D/B/B CONSTRUCTION AWARD (BASE PLUS OPTION) FOR A NEW GROUND TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT BUILDING AT DETROIT ARSENAL IN WARREN, MI$60.7M
    Department of the Army· Macomb County, MI· Construction & real property· May 23, 2024 – Jun 3, 2026· W912QR24C0011
  3. INITIAL OUTFITTING AND TRANSITION (IOT) FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES (FSS) IV GUARANTEED MINIMUM$3,000
    Department of the Army· Cook County, IL· Professional services· Apr 9, 2026 – Apr 9, 2026· W912DY26FA092

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $287.5K reported

  1. CH2M HILL, INC$287.5K
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 2 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GILBANE-EXYTE A JOINT VENTURE$73.5M−45% in FY2026
    PROVIDENCE, RI · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  2. TOKYU CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD.$73.8M+830% in FY2026
    TOKYO, JPN · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  3. WATTERSON CONSTRUCTION CO$75.3M−71% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.