Federal contractor · SCOTTSDALE, AZ

WCD ENTERPRISES, LLC

WCD ENTERPRISES, LLC received $128.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 13 awards (+183% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.1M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($63.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$128.6K
New awards
13
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
4.6%
UEI
J5W7T39P98J9
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 131.8KFY2017
  2. 187.5KFY2018
  3. 122.3KFY2019
  4. 141.2KFY2020
  5. 116.6KFY2021
  6. 92.4KFY2022
  7. 35.2KFY2023
  8. 64.9KFY2024
  9. 45.5KFY2025
  10. 128.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$128.6K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Hays County, TX$8,3166.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition4.6%
    US 39% · $5,964
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions4.6%
    US 8.8% · $5,964
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Forest Service· Coconino County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Sep 30, 2025 – May 12, 2026· 127EAU25C0002
  2. Department of the Army· Rogers County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Feb 10, 2023 – May 4, 2026· W912BV23P0035
  3. International Boundary and Water Commission: U.S.-Mexico· Val Verde County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Sep 13, 2023 – Jan 28, 2026· 191BWC23P0063
  4. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Hays County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Apr 22, 2024 – Jun 22, 2026· 140FS224P0166
  5. Forest Service· Morton County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Aug 25, 2023 – Jun 16, 2026· 1240LQ23P0086
  6. Forest Service· Nacogdoches County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Sep 30, 2024 – Aug 10, 2026· 12445024P0060
  7. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service· Maverick County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Aug 1, 2024 – Jul 20, 2026· 12639524C0081
  8. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service· Webb County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Aug 1, 2024 – Jul 21, 2026· 12639524C0085

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $52.8K reported

  1. HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LAUDER ENTERPRISE LLC$218.9K−39% in FY2026
    ALLIANCE, NE · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Services to buildings and dwellingsArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  2. OSVALDO VERA$124.8K+51% in FY2026
    BISHOP, CA · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Services to buildings and dwellings
  3. ANDREWS, NC · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Services to buildings and dwellings

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.