Federal contractor · ANN ARBOR, MI

XIOMAS TECHNOLOGIES LLC

XIOMAS TECHNOLOGIES LLC received $586.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards. Since FY2018: $6.8M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($586.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$586.7K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
PMBPW9RVUCL8
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 125KFY2018
  2. 750KFY2019
  3. 9.9KFY2020
  4. 0FY2021
  5. 5MFY2022
  6. 299.8KFY2023
  7. 0FY2024
  8. 0FY2025
  9. 586.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$586.7K100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$586.7K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Washtenaw County, MI$586.7K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $586.7K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $586.7K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$586.7K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. TRANSEFERRED FROM 80NSSC22CA227$5M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Washtenaw County, MI· Research & development· Feb 6, 2023 – Sep 29, 2026· 80NSSC23CA038
  2. PHASE III SBIR - AEOLUS THERMAL LIMB SOUNDER$586.7K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Washtenaw County, MI· Research & development· Sep 29, 2026 – Sep 29, 2026· 80NSSC26C0388

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KALSI ENGINEERING, INC$586.8K−100% in FY2026
    SUGAR LAND, TX · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  2. MACDONALD, DETTWILER AND ASSOCIATES INC$573.7K
    KANATA, CAN · 2 entities · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  3. ROBOCASTING ENTERPRISES LLC$544K−100% in FY2026
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.