Congressional district · Boundaries of the 119th Congress

Arizona's 6th district

Arizona's 6th district has 812,925 residents on 13,692 mi² of land. It is represented by Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ-6). Federal contract obligations attributed to it reached $3.5B in FY2026.

Residents
812,925
Land area
13,692 mi²
Counties
5
Representative
Juan Ciscomani
Open in the Congress explorer
Map of Arizona's 6th district within Arizona

Members for this district

Members who held this seat while these boundaries were in force, newest first.

Senators

The state's senators today, or on the last day of these boundaries for an older plan.

Counties

Share of the district's residents living in each county, and share of the county's residents living in the district (2020 census tracts weighted by their overlap).

  1. Pima County72% of the district · 55% of the county
  2. Cochise County13% of the district · 81% of the county
  3. Pinal County10% of the district · 17% of the county
  4. Graham County4.3% of the district · 89% of the county
  5. Greenlee County1.2% of the district · 100% of the county

Federal contracts

Contract obligations attributed to the district by each action's county and its award's ZIP code (land shares through census tracts); an estimate where ZIP codes cross district lines.

Obligations · FY2026
$3.5B
Per resident
$4,328
Rank in Arizona
3 of 9
Contract actions
6,270
New awards: 2,493

By fiscal year

  1. 2BFY2017
  2. 2.6BFY2018
  3. 2.2BFY2019
  4. 2.8BFY2020
  5. 2.4BFY2021
  6. 2.9BFY2022
  7. 3.1BFY2023
  8. 3.4BFY2024
  9. 3.6BFY2025
  10. 3.5BFY2026

Top buyers

  1. Department of the Air Force$911.5M26%
    Department of Defense
  2. Department of the Navy$866.6M25%
    Department of Defense
  3. Department of the Army$390.2M11%
    Department of Defense
  4. Missile Defense Agency$368.1M10%
    Department of Defense
  5. Public Buildings Service$347.4M9.9%
    General Services Administration
  6. Defense Contract Management Agency$330.2M9.4%
    Department of Defense
  7. Defense Information Systems Agency$104.4M3.0%
    Department of Defense
  8. Forest Service$28.6M0.8%
    Department of Agriculture

Top recipients

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANY$2.4B67%
    373 awards
  2. HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO.$340.1M9.7%
    2 awards
  3. PERATON INC.$69.2M2.0%
    3 awards
  4. GEOST, LLC$65.9M1.9%
    2 awards
  5. AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.$54.8M1.6%
    6 awards
  6. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.$37.5M1.1%
    3 awards
  7. ECS FEDERAL, LLC$37M1.1%
    1 award
  8. AGILE DEFENSE, LLC$34.1M1.0%
    67 awards
  9. PINNACLE SOLUTIONS, LLC$26.4M0.7%
    2 awards
  10. CTI COMPANIES, LLC$23.2M0.7%
    2 awards

Other boundaries

District lines change between plans; each plan keeps its own page.

Sources and method

Every figure on this page traces to these records.

  • Congressional district boundaries and relationship files (U.S. Census Bureau)U.S. Census Bureau, Cartographic Boundary Files (congressional districts) and 2020 relationship files · release cd116+cd118+cd119 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Members of Congress, their terms, committees and identifiers (The @unitedstates project (from the Biographical Directory of the U.S. Congress, the House and the Senate))unitedstates/congress-legislators: legislators, committees and current committee membership · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: CC0 1.0 (public domain dedication)
  • ZIP code (ZCTA) to congressional district crosswalk (U.S. Census Bureau)U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 relationship files (ZCTAs, tracts and congressional districts); shares computed by Analisa · release 2020 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov)USAspending.gov, prime award contract transactions (FPDS) · data current to Oct 3, 2026 · loaded Oct 3, 2026 · license: Public domain (U.S. Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
  • Money and votes are shown side by side; neither explains the other.