Federal contractor · SAN ANTONIO, TX

AEHS INCORPORATED

AEHS INCORPORATED received $408.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+8.6% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($403.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$408.2K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
14%
UEI
UQYNTMLJFKK6
Small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 294.8KFY2017
  2. 304.3KFY2018
  3. 309.4KFY2019
  4. 332.3KFY2020
  5. 238KFY2021
  6. 311.5KFY2022
  7. 395.8KFY2023
  8. 381.7KFY2024
  9. 375.7KFY2025
  10. 408.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$403.6K99%
    2 awards
  2. National Park Service$4,6161.1%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$403.6K99%
  2. Facilities & utilities$4,6161.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Bexar County, TX$345.1K85%
  2. Bell County, TX$58.5K14%
  3. Brewster County, TX$4,6161.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition14%
    US 39% · $58.5K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions14%
    US 8.8% · $58.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST (2CME)$1.3M
    Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Sep 9, 2022 – Mar 27, 2026· W81K0022P0238
  2. INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AIR QUALITY TESTING$58.5K
    Department of the Army· Bell County, TX· Professional services· Aug 19, 2025 – Jun 10, 2026· W81K0025FA190
  3. KBAR RANCH ASBESTOS AND LEAD TESTING$4,616
    National Park Service· Brewster County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Dec 22, 2025 – Dec 22, 2025· 140P2126P0003

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SEALASKA REMEDIATION SOLUTIONS, LLC$1.2M−42% in FY2026
    SEATTLE, WA · 99.6% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. HANA RESOURCES, INC.$1.1M−100% in FY2026
    LAKE FOREST, CA · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. GROUP SOLUTIONS, INC$1.2M−75% in FY2026
    EATONTON, GA · 99.6% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.