Federal contractor · EATONTON, GA
GROUP SOLUTIONS, INC
GROUP SOLUTIONS, INC received $186K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−75% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($186K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $186K
- New awards
- 6
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- LZF5AGT6KYK3
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 212.9KFY2017
- 113.2KFY2018
- 102.3KFY2019
- 36.1KFY2020
- -9.2KFY2021
- 91.1KFY2022
- 240.1KFY2023
- 268.4KFY2024
- 733.2KFY2025
- 186KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$186K100%6 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$186K100%
Where the work was performed
- St. Louis city, MO$85.3K46%
- Jackson County, MO$55.8K30%
- Geary County, KS$25.2K14%
- Pulaski County, MO$18.5K9.9%
- Abroad$1,2540.7%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- NWK GOVERNANCE SERVICES$289.2KDepartment of the Army· Jackson County, MO· Professional services· Sep 29, 2025 – Apr 7, 2026· W912DQ25F4015
- Department of the Army· Wyandotte County, KS· Professional services· Apr 25, 2023 – Apr 23, 2026· W912DQ23F7007
- Department of the Army· St. Louis city, MO· Professional services· Nov 21, 2025 – Nov 21, 2025· W912DQ26FA017
- Department of the Army· Geary County, KS· Professional services· Jan 15, 2026 – Jan 15, 2026· W912DQ26FA033
- Department of the Army· Pulaski County, MO· Professional services· Feb 19, 2026 – Feb 19, 2026· W912DQ26FA043
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- COTERIE ENVIRONMENTAL LLC$1.2M−105% in FY2026KING OF PRUSSIA, PA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- SEALASKA REMEDIATION SOLUTIONS, LLC$1.2M−42% in FY2026SEATTLE, WA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- AEHS INCORPORATED$1.2M+8.6% in FY2026SAN ANTONIO, TX · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.