Federal contractor · EATONTON, GA

GROUP SOLUTIONS, INC

GROUP SOLUTIONS, INC received $186K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−75% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($186K).

Obligations · FY2026
$186K
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
LZF5AGT6KYK3
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 212.9KFY2017
  2. 113.2KFY2018
  3. 102.3KFY2019
  4. 36.1KFY2020
  5. -9.2KFY2021
  6. 91.1KFY2022
  7. 240.1KFY2023
  8. 268.4KFY2024
  9. 733.2KFY2025
  10. 186KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$186K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$1,2540.7%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Jackson County, MO· Professional services· Sep 29, 2025 – Apr 7, 2026· W912DQ25F4015
  2. Department of the Army· Wyandotte County, KS· Professional services· Apr 25, 2023 – Apr 23, 2026· W912DQ23F7007
  3. Department of the Army· St. Louis city, MO· Professional services· Nov 21, 2025 – Nov 21, 2025· W912DQ26FA017
  4. Department of the Army· Professional services· Dec 19, 2024 – Jan 22, 2026· W912DQ25F4002
  5. Department of the Army· Geary County, KS· Professional services· Jan 15, 2026 – Jan 15, 2026· W912DQ26FA033
  6. Department of the Army· Pulaski County, MO· Professional services· Feb 19, 2026 – Feb 19, 2026· W912DQ26FA043

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. COTERIE ENVIRONMENTAL LLC$1.2M−105% in FY2026
    KING OF PRUSSIA, PA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. SEATTLE, WA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. AEHS INCORPORATED$1.2M+8.6% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.