Federal contractor · SEATTLE, WA

SEALASKA REMEDIATION SOLUTIONS, LLC

SEALASKA REMEDIATION SOLUTIONS, LLC received $484.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−42% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $26.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($484.3K).

Obligations · FY2026: $484.3K
New awards: 6
Sole-source: 100%
Single offer: 0.0%

UEI: KJFPJM86BPS4

Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

3.4MFY2019
1.2MFY2020
3.3MFY2021
14.1MFY2022
3.7MFY2023
-149KFY2024
834.2KFY2025
484.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

Department of the Army$484.3K100%
6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Construction & real property$385.5K77%
Facilities & utilities$116.6K23%

Where the work was performed

King County, WA$544.8K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Low competition100%
US 39% · $484.3K
Sole-source awards100%
US 30% · $484.3K
Single-offer competitions0.0%
US 8.7% · $0
Urgency justifications0.0%
US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

Department of the Army$484.3K
Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

FORT SMITH EA, FORT CHAFFEE, SMOKY HILL, HARDWOOD RANGE, FRESNO - ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PROCESS SERVICES$1.4M
Department of the Army· Sebastian County, AR· Facilities & utilities· Sep 30, 2022 – Dec 2, 2025· W9128F22F0301
MOBILE PROTECTED FIREPOWER FIELDING, OPERATIONS, AND MAINTENANCE AT MULTIPLE INSTALLATIONS$1.1M
Department of the Army· King County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 29, 2022 – Dec 4, 2025· W9128F22F0206
DEVELOP NEW AQUATIC RESOURCE ASSESSMENT METHODS IN NEBRASKA AND SOUTH DAKOTA ONE TAILORED TO STREAMS WITHIN THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA AND THE OTHER TO WETLANDS WITHIN THE STATE OF NEBRASKA.$741.2K
Department of the Army· King County, WA· Construction & real property· Sep 11, 2025 – Apr 15, 2026· W9128F25FA102
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE HUSTED, EDGERTON, NORTHFIELD (HEN) CORRIDOR DISTRICT PLAN AT THE AIR FORCE ACADEMY IN COLORADO$547.3K
Department of the Army· El Paso County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Sep 23, 2024 – Apr 17, 2026· W9128F24F0219
EIS REPORT$213.7K
Department of the Army· King County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Mar 25, 2026 – Mar 25, 2026· W912DW26FA016
CHEHALIS EIS TECHNICAL WRITING/EDITING$127.2K
Department of the Army· King County, WA· Professional services· Mar 8, 2024 – Apr 2, 2026· W912DW24F2018

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

FY2021: $576.4K paid out · $0 received
FY2022: $0 paid out · $106.7K received
FY2023: $7.4M paid out · $0 received
FY2024: $882.9K paid out · $0 received
FY2025: $168K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

24 companies · $9M reported

TETRA TECH, INC.$1.4M
PASADENA, CA · 4 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
DEFENDEC OU$1.3M
TALLINN, EST · 1 subaward · Other support services
PROPAC, INC.$1.3M
NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 1 subaward · Other support services

Primes that pay it

1 company · $106.7K reported

SEALASKA TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC.$106.7K
RICHLAND, WA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

AEHS INCORPORATED$1.2M+8.6% in FY2026
SAN ANTONIO, TX · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
GROUP SOLUTIONS, INC$1.2M−75% in FY2026
EATONTON, GA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
HANA RESOURCES, INC.$1.1M−100% in FY2026
LAKE FOREST, CA · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

SEALASKA CORPORATIONAI match · 92%

Lobbying · 2025: $200K; 4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026: $850K

Lobbying by year

2023$310K
8 reports
2024$210K
4 reports
2025$200K
4 reports
2026$130K
2 reports

Top issues

Natural resources18 reports
Budget and appropriations14 reports
Indian and Native American affairs14 reports
Marine, maritime, boating and fisheries9 reports

Who was contacted

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES18 reports
U.S. SENATE18 reports
Interior - Dept of (DOI)14 reports
U.S. Forest Service14 reports
Agriculture - Dept of (USDA)9 reports
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)9 reports
White House Office9 reports
Economic Development Administration5 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

Van Ness Feldman, LLP$730K
14 reports
Jack Ferguson Assoc., Inc.$120K
4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 41 · Unrecognized Southeast Alaska Native Communities Recognition and Compensation Act6 reports
119th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2025–2026
S. 255 · Archie Cavanaugh Migratory Bird Treaty Amendment Act6 reports
119th Congress · Introduced · 2025–2026
H.R. 4748 · Unrecognized Southeast Alaska Native Communities Recognition and Compensation Act5 reports
118th Congress · Reported by committee · 2023–2024
S. 1889 · Unrecognized Southeast Alaska Native Communities Recognition and Compensation Act5 reports
118th Congress · Reported by committee · 2023–2024
H.R. 8862 · Sustaining America’s Fisheries for the Future Act of 20243 reports
118th Congress · Introduced · 2024
S. 2554 · Unrecognized Southeast Alaska Native Communities Recognition and Compensation Act3 reports
119th Congress · Reported by committee · 2025–2026
H.R. 8973 · Native Arts and Culture Promotion Act2 reports
118th Congress · Introduced · 2024
S. 5258 · Archie Cavanaugh Migratory Bird Treaty Amendment Act2 reports
118th Congress · Introduced · 2024

11 of 18 reports (2023–2026) name at least one bill. Bills and resolutions the current reports name in their issue descriptions, by number of reports. A report names what it lobbied on, not which side it took.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.