Federal contractor · TULLAHOMA, TN

AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.

AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. received $103.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 164 awards (−57% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.5B. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($49.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$103.8M
New awards
164
Sole-source
8.1%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
K8QPQLGTRM33
Parent company
AMENTUM HOLDINGS INC.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the AMENTUM SERVICES, INC. company family: 53 registered entities, $6.9B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.CHANTILLY, VA · Family page
    $3.1B
  2. $622.2M
  3. $565.7M
  4. $554.8M
  5. $551.2M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 52.9MFY2017
  2. 32.2MFY2018
  3. 76.1MFY2019
  4. 105.5MFY2020
  5. 162.6MFY2021
  6. 167.5MFY2022
  7. 259.6MFY2023
  8. 287.4MFY2024
  9. 241.2MFY2025
  10. 103.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 148 awards
  2. 4 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 10 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$50.3M48%
  2. Facilities & utilities$40.8M39%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$12.3M12%
  4. Equipment maintenance$296.4K0.3%
  5. IT & telecom$265.9K0.3%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition8.1%
    US 39% · $8.4M
  • Sole-source awards8.1%
    US 30% · $8.4M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Santa Clara County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Oct 19, 2016 – Aug 18, 2026· NNA16BD26C
  2. Department of the Army· Armstrong County, PA· Facilities & utilities· Jul 28, 2021 – Apr 1, 2026· W912P421F0003
  3. Department of the Army· Armstrong County, PA· Facilities & utilities· Mar 27, 2025 – Jun 2, 2026· W912P425F0005
  4. Department of the Navy· Camden County, GA· Construction & real property· Jul 22, 2025 – Apr 22, 2026· N6945025F1116
  5. Department of the Navy· Kitsap County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Mar 28, 2025 – Jan 30, 2026· N4425525F4202
  6. Department of the Navy· Duval County, FL· Construction & real property· Dec 30, 2020 – Apr 7, 2026· N6945021F2655
  7. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Santa Clara County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 28, 2022 – Sep 4, 2026· 80ARC022FA032
  8. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Santa Clara County, CA· Facilities & utilities· May 31, 2024 – Sep 2, 2026· 80ARC024FA024

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $416.7K (38 subawards)

24 sub-recipients

  1. NIAGARA FALLS, NY · 2 subawards
  2. CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA · 1 subaward
  3. SAINT PAUL, MN · 2 subawards
  4. EXTON, PA · 3 subawards
  5. OAK RIDGE, TN · 2 subawards
  6. VERNON HILLS, IL · 2 subawards
  7. RENO, NV · 2 subawards
  8. MERIDEN, CT · 1 subaward
  9. EAST SYRACUSE, NY · 1 subaward
  10. GRECO GAS, INC.$8,6632.1%
    TARENTUM, PA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $24.6M (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. GREENVILLE, SC · 1 subaward
  2. COLUMBUS, OH · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 0.4% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $14.3M paid out · $27.4M received
  • FY2022: $23M paid out · $84.2M received
  • FY2023: $91.2M paid out · $37.6M received
  • FY2024: $70.4M paid out · $67.5M received
  • FY2025: $20.3M paid out · $10.7M received
  • FY2026: $416.7K paid out · $24.6M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

3,976 companies · $8.5B reported

  1. JUPITER, FL · 5 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. GLEISSL$389M
    BURGLENGENFELD, DE · 1 subaward · Facilities support services
  3. TEKSYSTEMS, INC.$365.1M
    HANOVER, MD · 60 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

77 companies · $1.4B reported

  1. HENRICO, VA · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. FREDERICK, MD · 87 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. GREENVILLE, SC · 14 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 135 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KBR SERVICES, LLC$8.8B−22% in FY2026
    HOUSTON, TX · 29 entities · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Facilities support services+6 more
  2. LYNCHBURG, VA · 13% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. V2X SYSTEMS LLC$4.6B−36% in FY2026
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 10 entities · 13% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support servicesAir Force · Facilities support servicesNavy · Facilities support services+3 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of AMENTUM SERVICES, INC. (53 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLCAI match · 100%
  • AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.AI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2023
$180K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2024
$320K
$320K in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$155.5K
2 PACs

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$180K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$140K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations6 reports
  2. Defense6 reports
  3. Environment and Superfund6 reports
  4. Homeland security6 reports
  5. Aerospace1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES6 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE6 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$117.3K75%
  2. Democratic$38.3K25%

PACs sponsored

  • AMENTUM SERVICES, INC. PAC$357.7K raised this cycle
  • DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (DIPAC)$43.4K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.