Federal contractor · SANTA CLARITA, CA

ASC PROCESS SYSTEMS, INC.

ASC PROCESS SYSTEMS, INC. received $103.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−18% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $6.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($59.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$103.9K
New awards
5
Sole-source
29%
Single offer
14%
UEI
NW2MQYWMLJL7
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 133.8KFY2017
  2. 108.8KFY2018
  3. 125.3KFY2019
  4. 3.2MFY2020
  5. 114.6KFY2021
  6. 866.5KFY2022
  7. 1.1MFY2023
  8. 289.3KFY2024
  9. 127.3KFY2025
  10. 103.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$59.2K57%
  2. Equipment maintenance$44.7K43%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition43%
    US 39% · $44.7K
  • Sole-source awards29%
    US 30% · $30.4K
  • Single-offer competitions14%
    US 8.8% · $14.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Oklahoma County, OK· IT & telecom· Dec 12, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025· FA812526P0004
  2. Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Equipment maintenance· Jul 3, 2025 – Dec 1, 2025· N3225325P1012
  3. Department of the Navy· St. Mary's County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Dec 4, 2024 – Dec 30, 2025· N0042125P0026
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Hampton city, VA· Equipment maintenance· Sep 23, 2026 – Sep 23, 2026· 80NSSC26P1722
  5. Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Equipment maintenance· May 22, 2026 – May 22, 2026· N3225326P0035

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $69K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. MELBOURNE, FL · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $109K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $30.4K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $69K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $1.9M reported

  1. CARLSBAD, CA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  2. SIMI VALLEY, CA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. FORT WORTH, TX · 2 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HOUSTON, TX · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Boiler, tank, and shipping container manufacturing
  2. BOONYIUM & ASSOCIATES LIMITED$227.6K−100% in FY2026
    BANGKOK, THA · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Boiler, tank, and shipping container manufacturing
  3. KEYMAN VENTURES LIMITED$363.7K−100% in FY2026
    NAIROBI CITY, KEN · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Boiler, tank, and shipping container manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.