Federal contractor · DENVER, CO

ATKINS - BLACK & VEATCH - FSB JV

ATKINS - BLACK & VEATCH - FSB JV received $14.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (+454% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $34.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($14.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$14.5M
New awards
9
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
21%
UEI
TGL2CLZQ6734
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3KFY2021
  2. 2.4MFY2022
  3. 9.7MFY2023
  4. 5.1MFY2024
  5. 2.6MFY2025
  6. 14.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards
  2. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$14.5M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$3M21%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition21%
    US 39% · $3M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions21%
    US 8.7% · $3M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Okaloosa County, FL· Construction & real property· Jul 12, 2024 – Jan 14, 2026· W9127824F0141
  2. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2023 – Apr 21, 2026· W912GB23F0412
  3. Department of the Army· Atlantic County, NJ· Construction & real property· Sep 23, 2022 – Mar 31, 2026· W50S8F22F0018
  4. Department of the Army· Crawford County, MI· Construction & real property· Dec 3, 2024 – Jun 1, 2026· W912JB25F0001
  5. Department of the Army· Denver County, CO· Construction & real property· Mar 4, 2026 – Apr 23, 2026· W50S7W26FA001
  6. Department of the Army· Richland County, SC· Construction & real property· Aug 17, 2023 – Nov 26, 2025· W50S9523F0021
  7. Department of the Air Force· Santa Barbara County, CA· Construction & real property· Jun 17, 2024 – Jan 30, 2026· FA461024F0117
  8. Department of the Air Force· Santa Barbara County, CA· Construction & real property· Apr 4, 2025 – Mar 12, 2026· FA461025F0075

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $480.1K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $458.6K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $938.7K reported

  1. ACACIA7$938.7K
    DIAMOND BAR, CA · 6 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BARGE EMERSION JOINT VENTURE$22.5M−72% in FY2026
    NASHVILLE, TN · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. YAEGER ARCHITECTURE INC$21.6M−44% in FY2026
    LENEXA, KS · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.