Federal contractor · NORTH CHARLESTON, SC

ATLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

ATLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. received $43.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−58% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $528.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($43.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$43.9M
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
CDKRUNL7D419
Parent company
ATLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Other than small businessVeteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 11.3MFY2017
  2. 20.3MFY2018
  3. 34.7MFY2019
  4. 44.2MFY2020
  5. 47.7MFY2021
  6. 64MFY2022
  7. 64.2MFY2023
  8. 94MFY2024
  9. 104.2MFY2025
  10. 43.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$43.9M100.0%
    4 awards
  2. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$26.8M56%
  2. Professional services$21.2M44%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. District of Columbia, DC$26.8M61%
  2. Charleston County, SC$17M39%
  3. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES THAT THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE TO NIWC ATLANTIC IN NAVAL MESSAGING SYSTEMS, INTERFACES, COMPONENTS, AND INTERCONNECTED USCG SYSTEM VARIANTS WITHIN THE USCG C4ISR.$222.5M
    Department of the Navy· Charleston County, SC· IT & telecom· Jan 12, 2021 – Jan 29, 2026· N6523621F3003
  2. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD (USCG) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND NETWORK BASED ENGINEERING SUPPORT$73.3M
    Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Equipment maintenance· Sep 10, 2025 – May 19, 2026· N6523625F3024
  3. THE ORDER PROVIDES NAVAL MESSAGING SYSTEMS ENGINEERING LIFECYCLE SUSTAINMENT AND CB-ISEA SUPPORT SERVICES TO NIWC ATLANTICS NAVAL MESSAGING IPT. THIS MULTI SPONSOR EFFORT INCLUDES SUPPORT FOR ASHORE AFLOAT AND SUBSURFACE TACTICAL MESSAGING PLATFORMS.$39.8M
    Department of the Navy· Charleston County, SC· Professional services· Jan 11, 2023 – Jun 11, 2026· N6523623F3003
  4. PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE (PEO) COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, COMPUTERS AND INTELLIGENCE (C4I) SYSTEMS TECHNICAL, SUSTAINMENT AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT (LCM)$35M
    Department of the Navy· Charleston County, SC· Professional services· May 7, 2024 – Apr 21, 2026· N6523624F3025
  5. SCALABLE HOMELAND INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISE LAYERED DEFENSE (SHIELD) INITIAL ORDER.$500
    Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FF942

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $30.3M (4 subawards)

4 sub-recipients

  1. INK TO THINK LLC$21.9M72%
    DANIEL ISLAND, SC · 1 subaward
  2. THOR SOLUTIONS LLC$7M23%
    ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  3. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH CORPORATION$1.1M3.6%
    ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward
  4. UBUN2GROUP INC.$320K1.1%
    LAGUNA WOODS, CA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 69% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $15.3M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $13.1M received
  • FY2023: $58.2K paid out · $10.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $6.5M received
  • FY2025: $30.2K paid out · $5.3M received
  • FY2026: $30.3M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

6 companies · $30.4M reported

  1. INK TO THINK LLC$21.9M
    DANIEL ISLAND, SC · 1 subaward
  2. THOR SOLUTIONS LLC$7M
    ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  3. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH CORPORATION$1.1M
    ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $50.4M reported

  1. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$34M
    RESTON, VA · 291 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH CORPORATION$12.7M
    ATLANTA, GA · 12 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS, INC.$2.7M
    LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WSM PACIFIC SIOP, A JOINT VENTURE$229.4M−92% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. INDUS TECHNOLOGY INC$209.8M−20% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SPALDING CONSULTING, INC.$208.7M−27% in FY2026
    LEXINGTON PK, MD · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.