Federal contractor · ARLINGTON, VA

THOR SOLUTIONS LLC

THOR SOLUTIONS LLC received $50.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (+48% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $163.9M. Its largest customer was U.S. Coast Guard ($38.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$50.3M
New awards
12
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
RQ8JN52L3244
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6.1MFY2017
  2. 5.4MFY2018
  3. 4.9MFY2019
  4. 5.6MFY2020
  5. 7.2MFY2021
  6. 7.7MFY2022
  7. 25.4MFY2023
  8. 17.5MFY2024
  9. 33.9MFY2025
  10. 50.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. U.S. Coast Guard$38.6M77%
    2 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$11.7M23%
    10 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$49.9M99%
  2. IT & telecom$417.5K0.8%

Where the work was performed

  1. District of Columbia, DC$38M75%
  2. San Diego County, CA$8.5M17%
  3. Bay County, FL$2.6M5.1%
  4. Mobile County, AL$622.2K1.2%
  5. Arlington County, VA$428.7K0.9%
  6. Newport County, RI$251.5K0.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THIS IS A FIXED-PRICED TASK ORDER UNDER THE OASIS SB POOL 3 CONTRACT FOR TWO (2) YEARS PROVIDING TECHNICAL ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES TO CG-459 AND VARIOUS PROGRAMS.$88.8M
    U.S. Coast Guard· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jun 13, 2023 – Sep 24, 2026· 70Z02323F45900001
  2. EXPEDITIONARY COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, COMPUTERS, NAVIGATION (C4N) SYSTEMS PROGRAM SUPPORT$18.9M
    Department of the Navy· Bay County, FL· Professional services· Jun 14, 2021 – Jun 8, 2026· N6133121F3007
  3. CODE 15 BUSINESS OPERATIONS$6.6M
    Department of the Navy· Newport County, RI· Professional services· Oct 17, 2016 – Mar 31, 2026· N401
  4. PROGRAM AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT, POLICY, AND PROCESSES SUPPORT SERVICES AT NAVAL INFORMATION WARFARE CENTER PACIFIC IN SAN DIEGO, CA.$5.3M
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Mar 19, 2021 – Mar 16, 2026· N6600121F3502
  5. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES$4.8M
    Department of the Navy· Arlington County, VA· Professional services· Aug 25, 2022 – Nov 4, 2025· N6600122F1002
  6. SMWDC ANALYTIC SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF ITS SEA COMBAT DIVISION (SHAREM AND SURFREM) AND MINE WARFARE DIVISION (MIREM).$3.8M
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Nov 17, 2025 – May 14, 2026· N0024426F3002
  7. AFLOAT TRAINING GROUP PACIFIC TRAINING SUPPORT - BATTLE LAB$3.6M
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Mar 4, 2026 – Mar 4, 2026· N0024426FS056
  8. AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT DIRECTION SYSTEM (AADS) SUPPORT$3M
    Department of the Navy· Bay County, FL· Professional services· Mar 16, 2022 – May 5, 2026· N6133122F3004

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $7.1M (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. ATLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$7M99%
    NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 1 subaward
  2. CHUGACH DYNAMIC SOLUTIONS LLC$59.1K0.8%
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $2.9M paid out · $2.5M received
  • FY2022: $1M paid out · $29.1M received
  • FY2023: $687.2K paid out · $4M received
  • FY2024: $8.1M paid out · $4.5M received
  • FY2025: $11.9M paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $7.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

13 companies · $24.7M reported

  1. AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$7.4M
    MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. GIBBS & COX, INC.$6.1M
    NEW YORK, NY · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. THE KENIFIC GROUP LLC$5.5M
    LEESBURG, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

12 companies · $48.8M reported

  1. AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$14.1M
    MCLEAN, VA · 15 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. INDUS TECHNOLOGY INC$9.8M
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ATLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$7M
    NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SHIELD AI INC$73.4M+226% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 2 entities · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Coast Guard · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SELLERS & ASSOCIATES, LLC$28.4M−20% in FY2026
    CHESAPEAKE, VA · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. TOTAL LOGISTICS SB JOINT VENTURE$28.2M−48% in FY2026
    MANASSAS, VA · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • THOR SolutionsAI match · 96%
Lobbying · 2025
$0
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$0

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$0
    4 reports
  2. 2024$0
    4 reports
  3. 2025$0
    4 reports
  4. 2026$0
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. ATS Communications, inc. (DBA Silbey Strategies)$0
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.