Federal contractor · MOBILE, AL

AUSTAL USA, LLC

AUSTAL USA, LLC received $361.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 60 awards (−55% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $8B. Its largest customer was U.S. Coast Guard ($209.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$361.2M
New awards
60
Sole-source
36%
Single offer
5.9%
UEI
RG6LJJM6JBS3
Parent company
AUSTAL LIMITED
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 603MFY2017
  2. 1.5BFY2018
  3. 1.4BFY2019
  4. 179.6MFY2020
  5. 309.6MFY2021
  6. 1BFY2022
  7. 428.3MFY2023
  8. 1.4BFY2024
  9. 807.1MFY2025
  10. 361.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 45 awards
  3. 14 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$351.9M97%
  2. Equipment maintenance$9.1M2.5%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$211.8K0.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$6.3M1.7%
  2. Aiken County, SC$117.8K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition42%
    US 39% · $151.5M
  • Sole-source awards36%
    US 30% · $130.1M
  • Single-offer competitions5.9%
    US 8.7% · $21.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · -$1M

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Mobile County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 23, 2017 – May 26, 2026· N0002417C2301
  2. U.S. Coast Guard· Mobile County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jul 5, 2022 – Sep 11, 2026· 70Z02322C93220001
  3. Department of the Navy· Mobile County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Oct 18, 2018 – Jun 8, 2026· N0002419C2227
  4. Department of the Navy· Mobile County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 18, 2023 – May 12, 2026· N0002423C2203
  5. Department of the Navy· Mobile County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 3, 2021 – Apr 28, 2026· N0002421C2209
  6. Department of the Navy· Mobile County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 14, 2022 – May 1, 2026· N0002422C2463
  7. Department of the Navy· Mobile County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 17, 2022 – Apr 1, 2026· N0002422C2243
  8. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Apr 3, 2025 – May 21, 2026· N5523625F8464

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

AUSTAL USA, LLC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
1
Since FY2022
$12.5M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 12.5MFY2022
  2. 0FY2024
  3. 0FY2026

Largest awards

  1. 12.777 · Defense Production Act Title Iii (Dpa Title III)· Department of the Air Force· Cooperative agreement· Oct 1, 2021 – May 27, 2026· FA86502025538

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2022–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $273.7K (4 subawards)

3 primes

  1. PITTSFIELD, MA · 2 subawards
  2. PORTSMOUTH, VA · 1 subaward
  3. PORTLAND, OR · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $10.3M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $12.4M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $73.1M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $43.3M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $3.9M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $273.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

9 companies · $143.4M reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 72 subawards · Ship and boat building
  2. PASCAGOULA, MS · 37 subawards · Ship and boat building
  3. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 25 subawards · Ship and boat building

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 19 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BLUEFORGE ALLIANCE$1.3B+21% in FY2026
    BRYAN, TX · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat building
  2. RAUMA, FIN · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Coast Guard · Ship and boat building
  3. VIGOR MARINE LLC$1.9B+48% in FY2026
    PORTLAND, OR · 4 entities · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat buildingU.S. Coast Guard · Ship and boat building

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Austal LimitedAI match · 100%
  • AUSTAL USA LLCAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$824K
23 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.9M
$2.9M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$39K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$836.2K
    22 reports
  2. 2024$864K
    22 reports
  3. 2025$824K
    23 reports
  4. 2026$377K
    10 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense41 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations23 reports
  3. Manufacturing9 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE50 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES47 reports
  3. Navy - Dept of20 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. S-3 Group$840K
    14 reports
  2. Van Scoyoc Associates$600K
    11 reports
  3. Capitol Integration$480K
    14 reports
  4. Bramer Group, LLC$180K
    6 reports
  5. Bondi Partners Advocacy Corp. (FKA PACIFIC PARTNERS)$180K
    4 reports
  6. Bob Riley & Associates$0
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$33.5K86%
  2. Democratic$5,50014%

PACs sponsored

  • AUSTAL USA LLC FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTIEE$51.5K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.