Federal contractor · BATON ROUGE, LA

BASCOM HUNTER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

BASCOM HUNTER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. received $7.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−42% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $94.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($6.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$7.3M
New awards
7
Sole-source
98%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
MPTHMD1MDBR1
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 275KFY2017
  2. 997KFY2018
  3. 9.9MFY2019
  4. 2.3MFY2020
  5. 15.9MFY2021
  6. 12.4MFY2022
  7. 6MFY2023
  8. 27.1MFY2024
  9. 12.5MFY2025
  10. 7.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$6.9M96%
  2. IT & telecom$326.6K4.5%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition98%
    US 39% · $7.1M
  • Sole-source awards98%
    US 30% · $7.1M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. CLIN 0001$21.5M
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Research & development· May 8, 2019 – Jan 28, 2026· N0003919C0020
  2. Department of the Army· East Baton Rouge Parish, LA· Research & development· May 19, 2026 – May 19, 2026· W912CH26CA021
  3. Department of the Air Force· East Baton Rouge Parish, LA· Research & development· Apr 30, 2024 – May 21, 2026· FA239124CB026
  4. Department of the Air Force· East Baton Rouge Parish, LA· Research & development· May 31, 2024 – May 21, 2026· FA239124CB025
  5. Defense Logistics Agency· East Baton Rouge Parish, LA· Research & development· Jan 23, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· SP470125C0045
  6. Department of the Navy· East Baton Rouge Parish, LA· IT & telecom· Nov 20, 2025 – Jan 5, 2026· N0003926F2001
  7. Department of the Navy· East Baton Rouge Parish, LA· Research & development· Dec 18, 2025 – Jun 8, 2026· M6785426C6555

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $310.7K (3 subawards)

2 primes

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 2 subawards
  2. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $675.7K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $3.9M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $310.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $4.9M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 5 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. GREENVILLE, TX · 1 subaward · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PHASE SENSITIVE INNOVATIONS INC$34.2M−40% in FY2026
    NEWARK, DE · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. OCEANIT LABORATORIES INC$68.1M−62% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services+2 more
  3. SEALANDAIRE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$30.9M−18% in FY2026
    JACKSON, MI · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • BASCOM HUNTER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$140K
9 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$450K
PAC giving · 2024
$13.8K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$150K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$120K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$140K
    9 reports
  4. 2026$40K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense26 reports
  2. Small business4 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES26 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE17 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. American Defense International, Inc.$170K
    12 reports
  2. FTI Government Affairs$170K
    9 reports
  3. RIDGELINE ADVOCACY GROUP LLC$110K
    6 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2024 cycle

  1. Republican$13.8K100%

PACs sponsored

  • BASCOM HUNTER TECHNOLOGIES INC EMPLOYEE ACTION FUND$0 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.