Federal contractor · SAN ANTONIO, TX

SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE

SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE received $124.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 132 awards (−53% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.9B. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($66.1M). It also received $19.2M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$124.1M
New awards
132
Sole-source
36%
Single offer
11%
UEI
PB11V1KH3KV4
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 141.6MFY2017
  2. 130.7MFY2018
  3. 126.8MFY2019
  4. 204.7MFY2020
  5. 257MFY2021
  6. 173.6MFY2022
  7. 239.2MFY2023
  8. 265.4MFY2024
  9. 266.3MFY2025
  10. 124.1MFY2026
  11. 372KFY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 27 awards
  2. 8 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 17 awards
  5. 2 awards
  6. 19 awards
  7. 3 awards
  8. 22 awards
  9. 4 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$101.1M77%
  2. Professional services$17.6M13%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$12.2M9.3%
  4. IT & telecom$36.7K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition47%
    US 39% · $57.9M
  • Sole-source awards36%
    US 30% · $44.5M
  • Single-offer competitions11%
    US 8.7% · $13.5M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Energy · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 3 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 3 awards
  5. Nuclear Regulatory Commission · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. AS THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (PI) INSTITUTION FOR THE MAGNETOSPHERIC MULTISCALE (MMS) INSTRUMENT SUITE SCIENCE TEAM (ISST), THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LEADING THE SOLVING MAGNETOSPHERIC ACCELERATION RECONNECTION AND TURBULENCE (SMART) TEAM THROUGH ALL MISSION PHASES. THE SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED, TO THE FOLLOWING: - MANAGE THE SMART TEAM THROUGH PHASES B THROUGH E OF THE MMS MISSION, - DEFINING SCIENCE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES - ASSIST THE MMS PROJECT AND HQ SCIENCE MISSION DIRECTORATE HELIOPHYSICS DIVISION IN THE PREPARATION OF LEVEL 1 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MMS MISSION - FLOW-DOWN OF TOP-LEVEL MISSION REQUIREMENTS TO THE APPROPRIATE ELEMENTS OF THE INSTRUMENT SUITE - DESIGN, FABRICATION, INTEGRATION, CALIBRATION, TESTING AND DELIVERY OF FOUR FULLY QUALIFIED, FLIGHT INSTRUMENT SUITES TO OBSERVATORY INTEGRATION AND TEST (I&T) PLUS SPARES - DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION AND TESTING OF THE SOC - SUPPORT OBSERVATORY-LEVEL I&T ACTIVITIES - PROVIDE SUSTAINING ENGINEERING AND I&T SUPPORT OF THE INSTRUMENT SUITES AFTER DELIVERY TO NASA - RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ON-ORBIT OPERATION, HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE INSTRUMENT SUITES - RESPONSIBILITY FOR OPERATING AND MAINTAINING THE SOC POST-LAUNCH - ESTABLISHING AND MANAGING SUBCONTRACTS WITH INSTRUMENT SUITE TEAM MEMBERS - ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING THE REQUIRED INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN ARMS REGULATIONS (ITAR) AND EXPORT CONTROL DOCUMENTATION NECESSARY FOR WORKING WITH ITS INTERNATIONAL TEAM MEMBERS - IMPLEMENTATION OF AN EPO PROGRAM FOR THE MMS MISSION$388.4M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Bexar County, TX· Research & development· Oct 7, 2016 – Aug 17, 2026· NNG04EB99C
  2. THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION HAS SELECTED JUNO NEW FRONTIERS MISSION UNDER THE DIRECTION OF PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (PI) DR. SCOTT BOLTON TO CONTINUE DEVELOPMENT WITH THE EXPECTATION THAT THE JUNO MISSION WILL ENTER PHASE B IN EARLY FISCAL YEAR 2006. THE JUNO MISSION WILL BE MANAGED BY THE MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER, NEW FRONTIERS PROGRAM OFFICE. KEY JUNO TEAM MEMBERS INCLUDE DR. BOLTON'S HOME INSTITUTION, THE SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE (SWRI), THE JUNO IMPLEMENTATION TEAM LEADER JET PROPULSION LABORATORY (JPL) AND THE SPACECRAFT BUS PROVIDER THE LOCKHEED MARTIN SPACE SYSTEMS DIVISION (LM/SS). THE PI'S TEAM AT SWRI NEEDS TO BEGIN WORK ON A SUBSET OF PHASE B ACTIVITIES AS EARLY IN FY06 AS POSSIBLE. THIS SOW PROVIDES A LIST OF ACTIVITIES THAT ARE NECESSARY TO BEGIN WORK IN FY06 AND THEIR ASSOCIATED DELIVERABLES. THE JUNO MISSION IS A COLLABORATION BETWEEN SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE (SWRI), JPL, LOCKHEED MARTIN (LM), AND A COMPLEMENTARY TEAM OF UNIVERSITIES AND FIELD CENTERS. THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR, DR. SCOTT BOLTON, IS AT SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE (SWRI) AND IS RESPONSIBLE TO NASA FOR ALL ASPECTS OF THE MISSION INCLUDING ACHIEVING ALL SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES AND MISSION GOALS. JPL PROVIDES THE PROJECT MANAGER WHO OVERSEES THE DAY-TO-DAY MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT AND WILL REPORT TO THE PI. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (PI) DR. SCOTT BOLTON IS RESPONSIBLE TO NASA FOR MEETING THE SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES OF THE JUNO MISSION WITHIN COST AND SCHEDULE. AS PI, DR. BOLTON HAS DIRECT ACCOUNTABILITY TO THE NASA NEW FRONTIERS PROGRAM OFFICE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF JUNO. ALL JUNO SCIENCE CO-IS, THE DEPUTY PI AND PROJECT SCIENTIST, THE SCIENCE INVESTIGATION OFFICE MANAGER, THE E/PO EFFORT, THE JUNO ADVISORY BOARD AND THE PM REPORT DIRECTLY TO DR. BOLTON. THE PI DELEGATES THE DAY-TO-DAY MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT TO THE PROJECT MANAGER (PM), RICK GRAMMIER. THE PROJECT SYSTEM ENGINEER, PAYLOAD MANAGER, FLIGHT SYSTEM MANAGER, MISSION MANAGER, SCIENCE OPS CENTER, BUSINESS MANAGER, LM CONTRACT CTM, AND MISSION ASSURANCE MANAGER ALL REPORT DIRECTLY TO THE PM.$184.3M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Bexar County, TX· Research & development· Oct 18, 2016 – Aug 13, 2026· NNM06AA75C
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Bexar County, TX· Research & development· Nov 28, 2016 – Jun 16, 2026· HQTR0200204DNASW02008
  4. UNDER THIS CONTRACT, THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE THE PERSONNEL, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND FACILITIES NECESSARY TO PRODUCE THE POLARIMETER TO UNIFY THE CORONA HELIOSPHERE (PUNCH) PHASE A CONCEPT STUDY. THE SCOPE OF THIS EFFORT INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO: 1. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR PROGRAM OFFICE 2. INSTRUMENT SYSTEM ENGINEERING, INCLUDING INSTRUMENT MISSION ASSURANCE 3. DESIGN OF A FLIGHT QUALIFIED PUNCH INSTRUMENT MEETING MISSION AND SCIENCE REQUIREMENTS 4. DEVELOP PLANS IN SUPPORT OF INTEGRATION AND TEST OF THE PUNCH INSTRUMENT FLIGHT SYSTEM 5. DEVELOP PLANS IN SUPPORT OF ESSENTIAL FIELD OPERATIONS 6. DEVELOP PLANS IN SUPPORT OF LAUNCH OPERATIONS AND FLIGHT OPERATIONS 7. DEVELOP PLANS FOR LEAD THE PUNCH SCIENCE INVESTIGATION AS WELL AS THE GENERATION OF RESULTING DATA PRODUCTS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A BRIEFING ON THE PUNCH SCIENCE AND SCIENCE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AT THE PHASE A SITE VISIT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN ORGANIZATION CHART DEFINING CONTRACTOR ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES, REPORTING PROCEDURES, AND ALL LINES OF AUTHORITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PARTICIPATE IN DEFINING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE CONTRACTOR'S PROGRAM OFFICE AND THE NASA EXPLORERS PROGRAM OFFICE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP A PUNCH INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT AND A PUNCH MISSION SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL ALSO DEVELOP DETAILED BLOCK DIAGRAMS AND TECHNICAL DESCRIPTIONS OF ALL INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS. THE CONTRACTOR WILL CONDUCT IN-DEPTH INSTRUMENT-LEVEL REVIEWS OF THE PROPOSED INSTRUMENT DESIGN. THEY WILL CONDUCT ESSENTIAL TRADE STUDIES, ANALYSES, MODELING AND SIMULATIONS TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH INSTRUMENT REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR WILL LEAD THE SCIENCE TEAM AND DEVELOP AN INSTRUMENT-LEVEL TEST PLAN AND PARTICIPATE IN PLANNING FOR INTEGRATION AND TEST. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE A DETAILED INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE COVERING ALL MISSION PHASES, LISTING MAJOR MILESTONES, INCLUDING A DEFINED CRITICAL PATH AND SCHEDULE RESERVES. THE CONTRACTOR WILL PREPARE UPDATED INSTRUMENT BUDGETS AS WELL AS REVIEW AND APPROVE THE OVERALL PUNCH BUDGET. FINALLY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT THE CONCEPT STUDY REPORT.$143.6M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Bexar County, TX· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 22, 2017 – Jun 30, 2026· 80GSFC18C0014
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Bexar County, TX· Research & development· Dec 30, 2016 – Jul 16, 2026· NNM16AA08C
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Bexar County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Oct 3, 2016 – Jul 14, 2026· NNG10EK25C
  7. Department of the Air Force· Martin County, IN· Research & development· Dec 7, 2020 – May 28, 2026· FA807521F0009
  8. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Bexar County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Oct 25, 2023 – Sep 8, 2026· 80GSFC24F0001

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE received $19.2M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 153 actions (19 new awards), −63% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 43.001 · Science ($15.5M).

Assistance · FY2026
$19.2M
New awards
19
Actions
153
Since FY2021
$171.3M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 15.9MFY2021
  2. 27.9MFY2022
  3. 22.2MFY2023
  4. 33.6MFY2024
  5. 52.6MFY2025
  6. 19.2MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$19.2M100%

Top programs

  1. 43.001 · Science$15.5M81%
  2. 43.003 · Exploration$1.5M7.6%
  3. 11.617 · Congressionally-Identified Projects$1M5.2%
  4. 81.089 · Fossil Energy Research and Development$998.6K5.2%
  5. 47.050 · Geosciences$359.6K1.9%
  6. 15.557 · Applied Science Grants-$29.370.0%
  7. 43.012 · Space Technology-$54.030.0%
  8. 15.963 · Southwest Border Resource Protection Program-$76.100.0%

Largest awards

  1. 43.001 · Science· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Cooperative agreement· Dec 1, 2023 – Dec 8, 2025· 80NSSC24M0001
  2. 43.001 · Science· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Cooperative agreement· Mar 8, 2022 – Feb 11, 2026· 80NSSC22M0065
  3. 81.135 · Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy· Department of Energy· Cooperative agreement· Mar 16, 2021 – Jun 16, 2026· DEAR0000837
  4. 43.001 · Science· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Cooperative agreement· Apr 14, 2022 – Jul 7, 2026· 80NSSC22M0111
  5. 43.003 · Exploration· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Cooperative agreement· Sep 28, 2023 – Mar 2, 2026· 80NSSC23M0176
  6. 43.001 · Science· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Cooperative agreement· Apr 7, 2022 – May 6, 2026· 80NSSC22M0104

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $32.5M (123 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $1.5M (18 subawards)

109 sub-recipients

  1. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward
  2. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  3. RESION LLC$3.1M9.0%
    LAKELAND, FL · 7 subawards
  4. PLYMOUTH, MI · 1 subaward
  5. SELLERSVILLE, PA · 1 subaward
  6. BOON LOGIC INC.$2M5.9%
    MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 1 subaward
  7. SAINTE GENEVIEVE, MO · 1 subaward
  8. WHITE SALMON, WA · 1 subaward
  9. GOTEBORG, SWE · 2 subawards
  10. MOOG INC$625.1K1.8%
    CHATSWORTH, CA · 2 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $45.3M (22 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $4.5M (26 subawards)

26 primes

  1. IOWA CITY, IA · 7 subawards
  2. DURHAM, NH · 5 subawards
  3. ARLINGTON, TX · 2 subawards
  4. PRINCETON, NJ · 1 subaward
  5. LAUREL, MD · 4 subawards
  6. BALTIMORE, MD · 3 subawards
  7. WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward
  8. PITTSBURGH, PA · 1 subaward
  9. BOULDER, CO · 3 subawards
  10. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 26% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $27.5M paid out · $68.6M received
  • FY2022: $32.9M paid out · $90.2M received
  • FY2023: $41.9M paid out · $40.7M received
  • FY2024: $80.6M paid out · $56.9M received
  • FY2025: $61.2M paid out · $124.8M received
  • FY2026: $34.1M paid out · $49.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

516 companies · $278.2M reported

  1. SAINTE GENEVIEVE, MO · 13 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. DALLAS, TX · 51 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. SAN JOSE, CA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

110 companies · $431.2M reported

  1. IOWA CITY, IA · 30 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. PASADENA, CA · 3 subawards
  3. LAUREL, MD · 30 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 53 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HX5 LLC$208.8M−42% in FY2026
    FORT WALTON BEACH, FL · 2 entities · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  2. TWO SIX LABS, LLC$205.4M−41% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services+1 more
  3. LUNAR OUTPOST INC$130.8M+3,218% in FY2026
    ARVADA, CO · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Southwest Research InstituteAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$580K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.3M

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$735K
    9 reports
  2. 2024$720K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$580K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$280K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations29 reports
  2. Science and technology26 reports
  3. Aerospace15 reports
  4. Defense14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES29 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE29 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD$1.1M
    14 reports
  2. ACTUM I, LLC$1.1M
    14 reports
  3. Clark Hill, PLC$80K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.