Federal contractor · STERLING, VA

BRIDGES SYSTEM INTEGRATION LLC

BRIDGES SYSTEM INTEGRATION LLC received $672.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+58% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4.9M. Its largest customer was National Institutes of Health ($337.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$672.6K
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
50%
UEI
V7L5MN65VCX3
Small businessVeteran-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.2MFY2017
  2. 354.1KFY2018
  3. 253.3KFY2019
  4. -12.9KFY2020
  5. -37.3KFY2021
  6. 1KFY2022
  7. 41KFY2024
  8. 427KFY2025
  9. 672.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$243.2K36%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$215.5K32%
  3. Professional services$214K32%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition50%
    US 39% · $337.5K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions50%
    US 8.8% · $337.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· IT & telecom· Aug 22, 2025 – May 29, 2026· FA251725P0058
  2. National Institutes of Health· Loudoun County, VA· Equipment maintenance· Jun 30, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026· 75N98026F00234
  3. Departmental Offices· Loudoun County, VA· Other equipment & supplies· May 1, 2026 – May 1, 2026· 140D0426F0440
  4. Departmental Offices· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Aug 3, 2026 – Aug 17, 2026· 140D0426F0814
  5. National Institutes of Health· Loudoun County, VA· Professional services· Apr 20, 2026 – Apr 20, 2026· 75N98026F00098

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2.4M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $394.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $4.5M reported

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. RESTON, VA · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. GROTON, CT · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CYRACOM INTERNATIONAL, INC$402.9K+98% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 2 entities · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. PEARSON PHARMA PARTNERS$350.7K+79% in FY2026
    WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC$439.1K−197% in FY2026
    NEW YORK, NY · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.