Federal contractor · ATLANTA, GA

BROCKINGTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

BROCKINGTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. received $2.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 28 awards (−30% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $21.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($2.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.5M
New awards
28
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
HU4VWMLXD553
Small businessWoman-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 132.4KFY2017
  2. 216KFY2018
  3. 781.2KFY2019
  4. 1.4MFY2020
  5. 1.1MFY2021
  6. 3.8MFY2022
  7. 1.8MFY2023
  8. 5.9MFY2024
  9. 3.5MFY2025
  10. 2.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$2.3M93%
    23 awards
  2. Department of the Army$160.9K6.6%
    4 awards
  3. Department of the Air Force$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$1.2M49%
  2. Construction & real property$987.1K40%
  3. Professional services$259.1K11%

Where the work was performed

  1. Duval County, FL$671.4K27%
  2. Norfolk city, VA$435.9K18%
  3. Camden County, GA$322.8K13%
  4. York County, VA$273.6K11%
  5. Harrison County, MS$161K6.6%
  6. Warren County, MS$160.9K6.6%
  7. Portsmouth city, VA$131.4K5.4%
  8. DeKalb County, GA$98.3K4.0%
  9. Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region, CT$69.6K2.8%
  10. Tarrant County, TX$52.8K2.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $2.5M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $2.5M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$2.3M
    Department of Defense · 12 awards
  2. Department of the Army$160.9K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY$834.9K
    Department of the Army· El Paso County, CO· Professional services· Sep 27, 2024 – Apr 30, 2026· W9128F24F0238
  2. THE WORK WILL MITIGATE THE LOSS OF APPROXIMATELY FOUR (4) CUBIC METERS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL DEPOSIT DESTROYED DURING UTILITY TRENCH EXCAVATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRITON TRAINING FACILITY. REF TO SCOPE OF WORK AND CONTRACTOR PROPOSAL.$596.6K
    Department of the Navy· Duval County, FL· Facilities & utilities· Jun 3, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· N6945026F0336
  3. DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES FOR AFSOC HALL OF HONOR EXHIBITS AND DISPLAYS.$397.3K
    Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Construction & real property· Aug 8, 2025 – May 29, 2026· FA441725C0012
  4. BASE - SAS LAKEWOOD INVESTIGATIONS TASK ORDER$387.8K
    Department of the Army· DeKalb County, GA· Professional services· Sep 13, 2024 – Apr 29, 2026· W912P924F0262
  5. 26L- NSB KINGS BAY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY, GA$322.8K
    Department of the Navy· Camden County, GA· Facilities & utilities· May 29, 2026 – May 29, 2026· N6945026F0317
  6. ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY OF PRE-COLD WAR-ERA (1918-1962) AND COLD WAR- ERA RESOURCES AND CHARACTER DEFINING FEATURE ASSESSMENT OF RESOURCES AT NAVAL STATION NORFOLK VA$288.9K
    Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Construction & real property· Feb 27, 2024 – Feb 17, 2026· N4008524F4728
  7. DEVELOPMENT OF INTEGRATED CULTURAL RESOURCES PLANS FOR NAVAL SUPP$259.8K
    Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Construction & real property· Sep 6, 2022 – Mar 18, 2026· N4008522F6304
  8. PHASE I AND PHASE II INVESTIGATIONS$221.9K
    Department of the Army· Orleans Parish, LA· Professional services· Mar 20, 2025 – Jan 26, 2026· W912P825F0052

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $80.7K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $158.6K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $254.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $494K reported

  1. THE HENRY M. JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE, INC.$254.8K
    BETHESDA, MD · 1 subaward
  2. SEALASKA REMEDIATION SOLUTIONS, LLC$158.6K
    SEATTLE, WA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. TETRA TECH, INC.$80.7K
    PASADENA, CA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NATIONAL SECURITY INNOVATIONS, INC.$7.6M−80% in FY2026
    NATICK, MA · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. JCTM LLC$10.3M−20% in FY2026
    CHARLOTTE, NC · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. LUMBEE TRIBE ENTERPRISES LLC$13.1M−1,110% in FY2026
    PEMBROKE, NC · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.