Federal contractor · CHARLOTTE, NC

JCTM LLC

JCTM LLC received $3.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−20% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $16.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($1.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.2M
New awards
4
Sole-source
55%
Single offer
25%
UEI
GSS8TXEFBFH7
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.2MFY2020
  2. 1.4MFY2021
  3. 1.6MFY2022
  4. 1.2MFY2023
  5. 3.1MFY2024
  6. 4MFY2025
  7. 3.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$2.4M75%
  2. IT & telecom$813.1K25%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition81%
    US 39% · $2.6M
  • Sole-source awards55%
    US 30% · $1.8M
  • Single-offer competitions25%
    US 8.8% · $813.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Federal Acquisition Service· Craven County, NC· IT & telecom· Dec 21, 2023 – Jul 21, 2026· 47QFSA24F0012
  2. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 11, 2026 – Apr 22, 2026· N0003026C4500
  3. Department of the Navy· Prince William County, VA· Professional services· Apr 22, 2026 – Apr 22, 2026· M6785426F0118
  4. U.S. Coast Guard· Mecklenburg County, NC· Professional services· Apr 28, 2026 – Aug 24, 2026· 70Z02326F61200001

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $63.5K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. GREENVILLE, SC · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $400.8K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $7.6M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $8.9M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $4.1M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $63.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $21M reported

  1. HERNDON, VA · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. LAUREL, MD · 7 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. FAIRFAX, VA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TAMAYO FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, LLC$11.4M−17% in FY2026
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesNavy · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. BROCKINGTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC.$11.9M−30% in FY2026
    ATLANTA, GA · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. TIGUA TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.$15.4M−79% in FY2026
    EL PASO, TX · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.