Federal contractor · KANSAS CITY, MO

BRUNSON INSTRUMENT COMPANY

BRUNSON INSTRUMENT COMPANY received $85.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−25% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($47.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$85.2K
New awards
4
Sole-source
56%
Single offer
37%
UEI
T18FUPT9Y124
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 244.8KFY2017
  2. 245.9KFY2018
  3. 252KFY2019
  4. 26.2KFY2020
  5. 183.3KFY2021
  6. 1.3KFY2022
  7. 140.1KFY2023
  8. 60.4KFY2024
  9. 113KFY2025
  10. 85.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$85.2K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition93%
    US 39% · $79.5K
  • Sole-source awards56%
    US 30% · $47.8K
  • Single-offer competitions37%
    US 8.7% · $31.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Jackson County, MO· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 23, 2026 – Feb 23, 2026· N6833526P0079
  2. Defense Logistics Agency· Jackson County, MO· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 19, 2026 – Mar 19, 2026· SPRMM126PMA73
  3. Defense Logistics Agency· Jackson County, MO· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 21, 2025 – Mar 19, 2026· SPE7L725P3072
  4. Defense Logistics Agency· Jackson County, MO· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 18, 2025 – Nov 18, 2025· SPE7M126V2517

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $842 (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. GREENVILLE, SC · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $647.4K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $842 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $648.3K reported

  1. SAINT IGNATIUS, MT · 1 subaward · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. TUCSON, AZ · 2 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AYALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC$236.2K−45% in FY2026
    CHICAGO, IL · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. Q-LAB CORP$311.7K−83% in FY2026
    WESTLAKE, OH · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. METROLOGYWORKS INC$278K−100% in FY2026
    BUCKNER, MO · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Metalworking machinery manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.