Federal contractor · KANSAS CITY, MO

BURNS & MCDONNELL, INC.

BURNS & MCDONNELL, INC. received $6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+2,311% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $50.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
Z8WNV7KTX267
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. company family: 3 registered entities, $63.8M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.KANSAS CITY, MO · Family page
    $56.5M
  2. BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY INCARLINGTON, VA
    $1.3M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-29

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.4MFY2017
  2. 4.5MFY2018
  3. 1.9MFY2019
  4. 426.7KFY2020
  5. 8.1MFY2021
  6. 4.4MFY2022
  7. 8.4MFY2023
  8. 13.2MFY2024
  9. 248.7KFY2025
  10. 6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$6M100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$6M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Oklahoma County, OK$5.5M92%
  2. Sebastian County, AR$336.8K5.6%
  3. Jackson County, MO$172.4K2.9%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $6M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $6M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. FY23 KC-46A DEPOT CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR A-E DESIGN$11.9M
    Department of the Army· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· Aug 23, 2023 – Jun 4, 2026· W912BV23F0121
  2. B21 BUILDING 9201 PHASE 2 DESIGN$11.2M
    Department of the Army· Jackson County, MO· Construction & real property· Jan 26, 2024 – Dec 16, 2025· W912BV24F0019
  3. EBBING ANGB F35 FMS ATC AE PROJECT$4.5M
    Department of the Army· Sebastian County, AR· Construction & real property· Sep 28, 2023 – Jun 5, 2026· W9127S23F0151

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $23.5K (2 subawards)

2 sub-recipients

  1. AVANT ACOUSTICS LLC$13.5K57%
    PRAIRIE VILLAGE, KS · 1 subaward
  2. CALIBRE ENGINEERING INC$10K43%
    HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 0.4% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $248.2K paid out · $10.9M received
  • FY2022: $247.9K paid out · $6.8M received
  • FY2023: $152.1K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $1.3M paid out · $53.9K received
  • FY2025: $218.7K paid out · $3.2M received
  • FY2026: $23.5K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

200 companies · $95.3M reported

  1. MOCA SYSTEMS, INC$12.5M
    BOSTON, MA · 154 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CRAWFORD CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.$9.6M
    EAST PITTSBURGH, PA · 144 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. FRANKLIN ENGINEERING GROUP INC$4.4M
    FRANKLIN, TN · 12 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

22 companies · $379.1M reported

  1. TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC$263.8M
    COLUMBUS, OH · 8 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC$61M
    FREDERICK, MD · 72 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. MNDPI PACIFIC JV$20.5M
    HONOLULU, HI · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TRAX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$561M−19% in FY2026
    LAS VEGAS, NV · 3 entities · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC.$619M−51% in FY2026
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 68 entities · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesState · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. DIGIFLIGHT INCORPORATED$183.5M−23% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA, MD · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc.AI match · 100%
  • BURNS & MCDONNELL, INC.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$560K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.9M
PAC giving · 2026
$230K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$450K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$590K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$560K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$300K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Economics and economic development14 reports
  2. Energy and nuclear14 reports
  3. Government issues14 reports
  4. Utilities14 reports
  5. Aviation, aircraft and airlines10 reports
  6. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code7 reports
  7. Foreign relations6 reports
  8. Small business4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. Energy - Dept of28 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES28 reports
  3. U.S. SENATE28 reports
  4. Army - Dept of (Corps of Engineers)14 reports
  5. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)9 reports
  6. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)6 reports
  7. Defense - Dept of (DOD)5 reports
  8. Treasury - Dept of5 reports
  9. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)4 reports
  10. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. VENN STRATEGIES$1.5M
    14 reports
  2. Kit Bond Strategies$410K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$136.5K59%
  2. Democratic$93.5K41%

PACs sponsored

  • BURNS AND MCDONNELL INC. PAC$495.8K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.