Federal contractor · CHANTILLY, VA

CACI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

CACI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC received $236M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 39 awards (−27% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.6B. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($238.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$236M
New awards
39
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
32%
UEI
NGEEG7KP11V4
Parent company
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the CACI, INC. - FEDERAL company family: 67 registered entities, $3.7B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. CACI, INC. - FEDERALCHANTILLY, VA · Family page
    $2.7B
  2. CACI NSS, LLCCHANTILLY, VA
    $423.9M
  3. CACI NSS, LLCRESTON, VA
    $183.7M
  4. MASTODON DESIGN LLCROCHESTER, NY
    $60.7M
  5. CACI INTERNATIONAL INCARLINGTON, VA
    $34.1M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 676.1MFY2017
  2. 557.3MFY2018
  3. 417.9MFY2019
  4. 280.1MFY2020
  5. 272.3MFY2021
  6. 236.4MFY2022
  7. 214.4MFY2023
  8. 371.8MFY2024
  9. 323.7MFY2025
  10. 236MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$238.2M100%
    26 awards
  2. Department of the Navy-$552.9K0.0%
    7 awards
  3. Defense Contract Management Agency-$1.7M0.0%
    6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$131.5M56%
  2. Research & development$105.1M44%

Where the work was performed

  1. Fairfax County, VA$108.7M46%
  2. Harford County, MD$76.3M32%
  3. Burlington County, NJ$48.3M20%
  4. Loudoun County, VA$2.1M0.9%
  5. Ocean County, NJ$1.1M0.4%
  6. Riverside County, CA$95.550.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition32%
    US 39% · $75.8M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions32%
    US 8.8% · $75.8M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · -$1,240

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. REPLICATION, EXPLOITATION, AND ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIAL THREATS PROGRAM (REACT) RS3-21-0034$237.8M
    Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Sep 21, 2023 – May 11, 2026· W56KGU23F0009
  2. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ACTION IS TO AWARD A NEW FIVE (5) YEAR TASK ORDER UNDER THE RS3 CONTRACT FOR MODELING AND SIMULATION, ANALYSIS, ENGINEERING, NETWORKING, AND EXPERIMENTATION SUPPORT$198.7M
    Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Apr 10, 2020 – May 21, 2026· W56KGU20F0012
  3. NAVAL FORCES LOGISTICS SUPPORT$178.1M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Nov 30, 2016 – Apr 22, 2026· FK11
  4. BASE AWARD FOR SUPPORT OF PROJECT MANAGER INTEGRATED VISUAL AUGMENTATION SYSTEM (PM-IVAS)$177.7M
    Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Apr 20, 2023 – May 21, 2026· W91CRB23F0094
  5. IGF::OT::IGF$165.6M
    Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Research & development· Jun 19, 2017 – Apr 13, 2026· BD05
  6. FMS BASE FUNDING.$118.7M
    Department of the Army· Ocean County, NJ· Professional services· Sep 22, 2021 – Apr 30, 2026· W56KGU21F0013
  7. SCIENTIFIC, ENGINEERING, TECHNICAL, AND ANALYTICAL (SETA) SUPPORT FOR: NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVSEA), NAVAL SHIPYARD AND NAVAL INDUSTRIAL BASE EFFORTS RELATED TO WORKFORCE, WORKLOAD, INTEGRATED PROJECT TEAM DEVELOPMENT (IPTD), LOGISTIC SERVICES, PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES, BUSINESS OPERATIONS, ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH, AND TOTAL FORCE SHIP MAINTENANCE EXECUTION INITIATIVES IN SUPPORT OF PROJECT EXECUTION AND DECK PLATE EFFECTIVENESS.$107.3M
    Department of the Navy· Charles County, MD· Professional services· Jul 20, 2018 – Mar 31, 2026· N0017418F3006
  8. NEW EQUIPMENT FIELDING AND TRAINING SUPPORT SERVICES$102.3M
    Department of the Army· Dale County, AL· Professional services· Jun 18, 2020 – Jan 7, 2026· W91CRB20F0290

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $35M (33 subawards)

27 sub-recipients

  1. KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC$21.1M60%
    FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
  2. INSIGHT GLOBAL, LLC$2.3M6.6%
    ATLANTA, GA · 2 subawards
  3. ZIVKO AERONAUTICS INC$1.9M5.5%
    GUTHRIE, OK · 5 subawards
  4. MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC. WASHINGTON D.C.$1.9M5.4%
    WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward
  5. ELITE TECHNICAL SERVICES INC$1.4M4.0%
    RONKONKOMA, NY · 1 subaward
  6. NEW TECH SOLUTIONS, INC.$1.4M4.0%
    FREMONT, CA · 1 subaward
  7. SAT-LITE TECHNOLOGIES LLC$794.8K2.3%
    WHITE OAK, TX · 1 subaward
  8. LEADING EDGE COMPOSITES, INC.$709.6K2.0%
    COATESVILLE, PA · 2 subawards
  9. CARBON BY DESIGN, LLC$458K1.3%
    CARLSBAD, CA · 1 subaward
  10. WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY LLC$375.9K1.1%
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 15% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $48M paid out · $712K received
  • FY2022: $24.6M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $89.6M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $304.4M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $88.7M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $35M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1,511 companies · $7B reported

  1. COLSA CORP$368.6M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 4 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORP$295.1M
    RESTON, VA · 237 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY LLC$279.6M
    MARYLAND HEIGHTS, MO · 493 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

87 companies · $1.4B reported

  1. DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP$193.3M
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 9 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$170.7M
    RESTON, VA · 18 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$135.3M
    GROTON, CT · 22 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 109 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$13.3B−22% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 31 entities · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services+10 more
  2. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$22.2B−18% in FY2026
    MCLEAN, VA · 31 entities · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services+11 more
  3. PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC$13.4B−8.6% in FY2026
    CHANTILLY, VA · 60 entities · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services+6 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of CACI, INC. - FEDERAL (67 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • CACI INTERNATIONAL INCAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$650K
12 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.1M
PAC giving · 2026
$126.3K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$550K
    17 reports
  2. 2024$560K
    12 reports
  3. 2025$650K
    12 reports
  4. 2026$340K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense40 reports
  2. Homeland security14 reports
  3. Economics and economic development3 reports
  4. Budget and appropriations1 reports
  5. Government issues1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES40 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE38 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. J.A. Green and Company (formerly LLC)$810K
    14 reports
  2. Icebreaker Strategies, LLC$660K
    13 reports
  3. A1.9 STRATEGIES LLC$520K
    14 reports
  4. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$110K
    4 reports
  5. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$0
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$83K66%
  2. Democratic$43.3K34%

PACs sponsored

  • CACI INTERNATIONAL INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (CACI PAC)$242.5K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.