Federal contractor · COLORADO SPRINGS, CO

CALIOLA ENGINEERING, LLC

CALIOLA ENGINEERING, LLC received $16.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 18 awards (−15% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $87.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($11.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$16.6M
New awards
18
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
86%
UEI
Q9DSGGYNU8J9
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.9MFY2019
  2. 5.8MFY2020
  3. 9.7MFY2021
  4. 11.9MFY2022
  5. 10.8MFY2023
  6. 11.5MFY2024
  7. 19.6MFY2025
  8. 16.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards
  2. 11 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$11.7M70%
  2. Research & development$4.9M30%

Where the work was performed

  1. El Paso County, CO$16.6M100.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition86%
    US 39% · $14.3M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions86%
    US 8.8% · $14.3M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· Professional services· Aug 23, 2024 – Apr 22, 2026· FA204124FB007
  2. Department of the Navy· El Paso County, CO· Research & development· Apr 15, 2021 – Apr 21, 2026· N6833521C0358
  3. Department of the Navy· El Paso County, CO· Research & development· Apr 5, 2023 – Oct 30, 2025· N6833523C0138
  4. Department of the Navy· El Paso County, CO· Research & development· Apr 10, 2026 – Jun 9, 2026· M6785426C2006
  5. Department of the Navy· El Paso County, CO· Research & development· Apr 10, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· M6785426C2007
  6. Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· Research & development· May 23, 2025 – Jun 1, 2026· FA864925P0230
  7. Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· Research & development· Sep 5, 2024 – Mar 3, 2026· FA864924P0973
  8. Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· Research & development· Jul 16, 2025 – Oct 7, 2025· FA945325CX043

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $370.2K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $650.6K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $5.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $402.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $6.5M reported

  1. ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 32 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. LAUREL, MD · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. APOGEE RESEARCH LLC$52.2M+54% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services+1 more
  2. BELLEVUE, NE · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. OMITRON, INC.$42.5M+391% in FY2026
    BELTSVILLE, MD · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.