Federal contractor · SAMOIS-SUR-SEINE

CORNING SAS

No contract obligations recorded for CORNING SAS in FY2026. Since FY2019: $830K.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
XCJKJHN1E2B5
Parent company
CORNING INCORPORATED
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the CORNING INCORPORATED company family: 13 registered entities, -$118.6K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. CORNING INCORPORATEDCORNING, NY · Family page
    -$118.6K
  2. $0
  3. $0
  4. CORNING INCORPORATEDWILMINGTON, NC
    $0
  5. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 86KFY2019
  2. 744KFY2020
  3. 0FY2022

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for CORNING SAS in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

9 companies · $80.8M reported

  1. TUCSON, AZ · 73 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 23 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. MELBOURNE, FL · 7 subawards · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HADAL, INC$127.5K−100% in FY2026
    OAKLAND, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. KING OF PRUSSIA, PA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. AMERICAN CRANE & EQUIPMENT CORP$158.2K−81% in FY2026
    DOUGLASSVILLE, PA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of CORNING INCORPORATED (13 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • CORNING INCORPORATEDAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.8M
25 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$5.3M
$5.3M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$228.3K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$1.3M
    23 reports
  2. 2024$1.1M
    21 reports
  3. 2025$1.8M
    25 reports
  4. 2026$1.1M
    11 reports

Top issues

  1. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code58 reports
  2. Telecommunications27 reports
  3. Manufacturing25 reports
  4. Budget and appropriations11 reports
  5. Energy and nuclear11 reports
  6. Foreign relations9 reports
  7. Trade (domestic and foreign)9 reports
  8. Environment and Superfund7 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES63 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE63 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. BGR Government Affairs$1.1M
    14 reports
  2. Avoq, LLC$840K
    14 reports
  3. BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS$550K
    12 reports
  4. Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP$530K
    7 reports
  5. The Duberstein Group Inc.$180K
    3 reports
  6. Hogan Lovells Cadwalader US LLP (FKA Hogan Lovells US LLP)$20K
    13 reports
  7. Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP$0
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$148.3K65%
  2. Democratic$80K35%

PACs sponsored

  • CORNING INCORPORATED EMPLOYEES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (COREPAC)$265.5K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.