Federal contractor · WINONA, MN

CYTEC ENGINEERED MATERIALS, INC.

CYTEC ENGINEERED MATERIALS, INC. received $279.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−96% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $16.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($279.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$279.9K
New awards
3
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
G5JHZ7DAK9A9
Parent company
SOLVAY
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $279.9K in FY2026 together.

  1. CYTEC ENGINEERED MATERIALS, INC.WINONA, MN · Family page
    $279.9K
  2. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 73.8KFY2017
  2. 152.3KFY2018
  3. 144.9KFY2019
  4. 229.3KFY2020
  5. 4.4KFY2021
  6. 64.8KFY2023
  7. 8.8MFY2024
  8. 6.5MFY2025
  9. 279.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$279.9K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $288.6K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $288.6K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Winona County, MN· Research & development· Sep 27, 2024 – Feb 4, 2026· FA239424CB050
  2. Department of the Navy· Winona County, MN· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 14, 2025 – Jan 26, 2026· N6893626P5008
  3. Department of the Navy· Fulton County, GA· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 17, 2025 – Oct 8, 2025· N6893625P5288

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $11.2K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. CORINNE, UT · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $115.6K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $3.9M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $4M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $3.9M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $11.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $15.3M reported

  1. MELBOURNE, FL · 25 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 12 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. GREENVILLE, TX · 1 subaward · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DCS CORPORATION$14.4M−72% in FY2026
    BEAVERCREEK TOWNSHIP, OH · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. DELTA CONSTELLATION GROUP, LLC$15.8M−100% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. PRAESES, LLC$15.8M+386% in FY2026
    SHREVEPORT, LA · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.