Federal contractor · BOHEMIA, NY

DAYTON T. BROWN, INC.

DAYTON T. BROWN, INC. received $8.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 69 awards (−63% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $192.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$8.1M
New awards
69
Sole-source
97%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GN84UHWZJMR8
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $8.1M in FY2026 together.

  1. DAYTON T. BROWN, INC.BOHEMIA, NY · Family page
    $8.1M
  2. DAYTON T. BROWN, INC.HOLLYWOOD, MD
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6.9MFY2017
  2. 2.2MFY2018
  3. 29.9MFY2019
  4. 33.3MFY2020
  5. 24MFY2021
  6. 22.8MFY2022
  7. 19MFY2023
  8. 24.6MFY2024
  9. 21.7MFY2025
  10. 8.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$8M99%
    12 awards
  2. Defense Logistics Agency$352.3K4.4%
    49 awards
  3. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards
  4. Federal Railroad Administration-$10.1K0.0%
    2 awards
  5. Department of the Air Force-$24.9K0.0%
    2 awards
  6. Defense Contract Management Agency-$245.8K0.0%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$8M95%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$451.3K5.3%

Where the work was performed

  1. St. Mary's County, MD$7.8M96%
  2. Suffolk County, NY$317.9K3.9%
  3. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition96%
    US 39% · $7.8M
  • Sole-source awards97%
    US 30% · $7.8M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · -$45.2K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$8M
    Department of Defense · 3 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$20.4K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. NEW TASK ORDER UNDER THE BOA FOR THE MMS SUPPORT SERVICES.$30.5M
    Department of the Navy· St. Mary's County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Mar 22, 2024 – Jun 11, 2026· N0042124F0184
  2. TRITON REMOTE QUICK LOOK$16.9M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Suffolk County, NY· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Aug 7, 2019 – Oct 14, 2025· N0042119F0733
  3. DTB- DOMESTIC$13.4M
    Department of the Navy· Suffolk County, NY· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 25, 2022 – May 21, 2026· N0042122C0022
  4. MFOB PRODUCTION$8.9M
    Department of the Navy· St. Mary's County, MD· Professional services· Sep 28, 2022 – Apr 21, 2026· N0042122C0045
  5. NEW TASK ORDER TO SUPPORT MMS SERVICES$7.1M
    Department of the Navy· St. Mary's County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Jun 18, 2024 – May 21, 2026· N0042124F0512
  6. FY25 RDT&E M-FOB 1$3.9M
    Department of the Navy· St. Mary's County, MD· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 28, 2025 – Jan 8, 2026· N0042125F7024
  7. URT-140$678.4K
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Suffolk County, NY· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 30, 2022 – Feb 6, 2026· N0042122F1094
  8. ENGINEERING AND TESTING SOLE SOURCE$266.9K
    Department of the Navy· Suffolk County, NY· Professional services· Sep 26, 2025 – Apr 24, 2026· N0018925FZ831

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $313.5K (3 subawards)

2 primes

  1. SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORP$237.6K76%
    STRATFORD, CT · 2 subawards
  2. BOEING COMPANY, THE$75.9K24%
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $17.3M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $48.5M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $5.9M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $6.8M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $6.5M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $313.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

23 companies · $85.3M reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$37.4M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 47 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$33.7M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 11 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$3.4M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MAGEE TECHNOLOGIES LLC$41.4M−39% in FY2026
    CALIFORNIA, MD · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. TACTICAL AIR SUPPORT, INC.$65.1M−100% in FY2026
    JACKSONVILLE, FL · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. GLOBAL AIR LOGISTICS AND TRAINING, INC.$68.2M+5.1% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of DAYTON T. BROWN, INC. (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Dayton T. BrownAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2026
$100K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026
$110K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$10K
    2 reports
  2. 2026$100K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense4 reports
  2. Manufacturing4 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES6 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. MAVERICK HILL PARTNERS$60K
    2 reports
  2. Thorn Run Partners$40K
    2 reports
  3. Gipper Communications, LLC$10K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.