Federal contractor · ORLANDO, FL

DESIGN INTERACTIVE, LLC

DESIGN INTERACTIVE, LLC received $6.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 16 awards (−50% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $69.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($2.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.1M
New awards
16
Sole-source
24%
Single offer
40%
UEI
LHN2HN7285X3
Small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6.4MFY2017
  2. 6.7MFY2018
  3. 5.9MFY2019
  4. 5.2MFY2020
  5. 2.1MFY2021
  6. 11.7MFY2022
  7. 4.7MFY2023
  8. 8.2MFY2024
  9. 12.3MFY2025
  10. 6.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$2.3M38%
    5 awards
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs$1.5M24%
    1 awards
  3. Department of the Air Force$1.2M20%
    1 awards
  4. Defense Human Resources Activity$1.1M18%
    1 awards
  5. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards
  6. Immediate Office of the Secretary of Transportation$00.0%
    3 awards
  7. Defense Contract Management Agency$00.0%
    3 awards
  8. Defense Health Agency$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$4.6M76%
  2. Professional services$1.5M24%

Where the work was performed

  1. Orange County, FL$5M82%
  2. Alexandria city, VA$1.1M18%
  3. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition65%
    US 39% · $3.9M
  • Sole-source awards24%
    US 30% · $1.5M
  • Single-offer competitions40%
    US 8.8% · $2.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. INSTRUCTIONAL SYSTEMS DESIGN SUPPORT$8.3M
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Orange County, FL· Professional services· May 10, 2024 – Jun 30, 2026· 36C10X24C0012
  2. MEDICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT ARMY SBIR PH III PROPOSAL NO. JW210493 TITLED AUGMED MOBILE: ANYWHERE, ANYTIME MILITARY CROSS SERVICE IMMERSIVE MEDICAL TRAINING.$3.8M
    Defense Health Agency· Orange County, FL· Research & development· Sep 21, 2022 – Feb 26, 2026· W81XWH22C0085
  3. 873AUTHORITY$2M
    Department of the Navy· Orange County, FL· Research & development· Apr 30, 2025 – May 26, 2026· N6426725C7026
  4. SBIR PHASE II$2M
    Department of the Navy· Orange County, FL· Research & development· Dec 1, 2022 – Feb 12, 2026· N6833523C0063
  5. "SQUADSYNC" MOBILE APPLICATION$1.9M
    Department of the Air Force· Orange County, FL· Research & development· Jul 3, 2024 – Feb 10, 2026· FA238424CB004
  6. BASE$1.6M
    Department of the Navy· Orange County, FL· Research & development· Mar 27, 2024 – Mar 23, 2026· N0002424CS029
  7. HUMAN-MACHINE INTERFACE (HMI) AND HUMAN-SYSTEMS INTEGRATION (HSI) FOR THE SHIP MAINTENANCE DATA IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE (SMDII)$1.6M
    Department of the Navy· Orange County, FL· Research & development· Feb 21, 2024 – Apr 23, 2026· N0001424C2409
  8. BASE$1.4M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Chittenden County, VT· Research & development· Sep 18, 2025 – Oct 28, 2025· N0002425CS260

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

DESIGN INTERACTIVE, LLC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$410K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 410KFY2021
  2. 0FY2022
  3. -10FY2023

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2021–FY2023.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $6.5M (5 subawards)

1 prime

  1. THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY$6.5M100%
    UNIVERSITY PARK, PA · 5 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $3M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $504K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $6.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $15.2M reported

  1. THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY$8.6M
    UNIVERSITY PARK, PA · 9 subawards
  2. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$3.3M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 21 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. TETRA TECH, INC.$1.4M
    PASADENA, CA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 14 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ALPHACORE INC$15.2M−54% in FY2026
    TEMPE, AZ · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. BARRON ASSOCIATES, INC.$11.3M−88% in FY2026
    CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Health Agency · Scientific research and development services+1 more
  3. ARCHITECTURE TECHNOLOGY INC$14.2M−88% in FY2026
    EDEN PRAIRIE, MN · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.