Federal contractor · BETHESDA, MD

DESIGN TO DELIVERY INC

DESIGN TO DELIVERY INC received -$256.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−152% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $55.4M. Its largest customer was Agricultural Research Service (-$122K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$256.9K
New awards
4
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
FKAWHMMX1AZ1
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 8.3MFY2017
  2. 8.2MFY2018
  3. 10.9MFY2019
  4. 9.9MFY2020
  5. 8MFY2021
  6. 4.2MFY2022
  7. 3.5MFY2023
  8. 2.3MFY2024
  9. 490.9KFY2025
  10. -256.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Agricultural Research Service-$122K0.0%
    3 awards
  2. Department of the Navy-$134.9K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. ACQUISITION&CONTRACTING SUPPORT$12.2M
    Department of the Navy· Martin County, IN· Professional services· Nov 29, 2016 – Feb 25, 2026· FC02
  2. CONTRACTOR SUPPORT SHALL ASSIST IN PURCHASING SUPPLIES, SERVICES, AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL, DEPARTMENTAL, AND MISSION-AREA ACQUISITION REGULATIONS, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES.$382.7K
    Agricultural Research Service· Prince George's County, MD· Professional services· Aug 18, 2021 – Jan 14, 2026· 1232SA21F0127
  3. CONTRACTOR SUPPORT SHALL ASSIST IN PURCHASING SUPPLIES, SERVICES, AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL, DEPARTMENTAL, AND MISSION-AREA ACQUISITION REGULATIONS, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES.$307.2K
    Agricultural Research Service· Prince George's County, MD· Professional services· Aug 23, 2021 – Jan 16, 2026· 1232SA21F0132
  4. ACQUISITION SUPPORT SERVICES BPA CALL$61.1K
    Agricultural Research Service· Prince George's County, MD· Professional services· Mar 31, 2021 – Aug 28, 2026· 12305B21F0056

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $23.2K reported

  1. THE MITRE CORPORATION$23.2K
    MC LEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. C3 INNOVATIONS INC.$3.4M+54% in FY2026
    LEONARDTOWN, MD · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. NTS TECHNICAL SYSTEMS LLC$1.6M+52% in FY2026
    CAMDEN, AR · 2 entities · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. LINXX GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, LLC$1.7M
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.