Federal contractor · GERMANTOWN, MD

RADA TECHNOLOGIES LLC

RADA TECHNOLOGIES LLC received $56.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+310% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $74.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($30.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$56.4M
New awards
4
Sole-source
2.1%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
G1N7T8SNJ6Y3
Parent company
LEONARDO S.P.A.
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the DRS NETWORK & IMAGING SYSTEMS LLC company family: 60 registered entities, $443.9M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. DRS NETWORK & IMAGING SYSTEMS LLCMELBOURNE, FL · Family page
    $161.2M
  2. $70.3M
  3. LEONARDO UK LTDLUTON, GBR
    $48.4M
  4. DRS SYSTEMS, INCMELBOURNE, FL
    $45.1M
  5. DRS ADVANCED ISR LLCBEAVERCREEK, OH
    $37.4M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 783.3KFY2020
  2. 581.9KFY2021
  3. 805.6KFY2022
  4. 823KFY2023
  5. 1.3MFY2024
  6. 13.7MFY2025
  7. 56.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$55.2M98%
  2. Equipment maintenance$1.2M2.1%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition2.1%
    US 39% · $1.2M
  • Sole-source awards2.1%
    US 30% · $1.2M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications44%
    US 5.1% · $24.7M

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Montgomery County, MD· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 13, 2026 – Jun 12, 2026· W912CH26PA008
  2. Department of State· Montgomery County, MD· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 5, 2026 – Jul 6, 2026· 19AQMM26C0301
  3. Department of the Navy· Montgomery County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Mar 21, 2022 – Mar 21, 2026· M6785422C0025
  4. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· HQ085926FF324

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $64.5M (13 subawards)

7 primes

  1. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 6 subawards
  2. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward
  3. ROCKVILLE, MD · 1 subaward
  4. FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
  5. CHANTILLY, VA · 2 subawards
  6. WOODBRIDGE, NJ · 1 subaward
  7. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $14.5M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $15.5M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $41.1M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $57.8M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $9.2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $64.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

824 companies · $1.8B reported

  1. BURNSVILLE, MN · 165 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. MOOG INC$89.8M
    EAST AURORA, NY · 101 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. MACK TECHNOLOGIES FLORIDA, INC.$60.9M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 146 subawards · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing

Primes that pay it

71 companies · $6.7B reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 1,165 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. GROTON, CT · 284 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  3. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 324 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 113 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. UNDERSEA SENSOR SYSTEMS, INC.$640.9M−38% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA CITY, IN · 18% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. KONGSBERG, NOR · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingArmy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. FAIRWINDS TECHNOLOGIES LLC$1.2B+1.3% in FY2026
    ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD · 15% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingArmy · Communications equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of DRS NETWORK & IMAGING SYSTEMS LLC (60 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Leonardo S.P.A.AI match · 100%
  • Leonardo US Cyber and Security Solutions LLC. (Formerly SELEX ES INC.)AI match · 100%
  • Leonardo Electronics US Inc.AI match · 97%
  • RADA Technologies LLCAI match · 94%
Lobbying · 2025
$230K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$760K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$180K
    7 reports
  2. 2024$60K
    3 reports
  3. 2025$230K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$290K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Homeland security15 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations13 reports
  3. Defense12 reports
  4. Law enforcement, crime and criminal justice9 reports
  5. Transportation9 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES22 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE16 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. American Defense International, Inc.$200K
    6 reports
  2. BALLARD PARTNERS$200K
    2 reports
  3. THE PRENDA GROUP LLC$180K
    9 reports
  4. Capitoline Consulting, LLC$160K
    4 reports
  5. PRASAM$20K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.