Federal contractor · WASHINGTON, DC

DKW COMMUNICATIONS INC

DKW COMMUNICATIONS INC received $13.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+32% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $163.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($9.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$13.2M
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
26%
UEI
DKDMARTHRKD9
Parent company
DKW COMMUNICATIONS INC
Small businessMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 13MFY2017
  2. 19.6MFY2018
  3. 20.8MFY2019
  4. 21.2MFY2020
  5. 19.1MFY2021
  6. 16.6MFY2022
  7. 14.2MFY2023
  8. 16.3MFY2024
  9. 10MFY2025
  10. 13.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$9.8M74%
  2. IT & telecom$3.4M26%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition26%
    US 39% · $3.4M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions26%
    US 8.8% · $3.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Orange County, FL· Equipment maintenance· Oct 31, 2025 – Apr 30, 2026· N6134026F0001
  2. Departmental Offices· Jefferson County, CO· IT & telecom· Mar 27, 2024 – Jun 26, 2026· 140D0424F0174
  3. Departmental Offices· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Feb 28, 2024 – Oct 6, 2025· 140D0424F0061
  4. Department of the Air Force· Santa Barbara County, CA· Professional services· Dec 19, 2025 – Feb 19, 2026· FA461026P0005

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. L3HARRIS LINCHPIN LABS, INC.$28.9M+6.5% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MALASHA TECHNOLOGIES INC$37.1M+6.6% in FY2026
    WEST CHESTER, OH · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. JMA RESOURCES, INC.$44.5M−48% in FY2026
    MECHANICSBURG, PA · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.