Federal contractor · HOFFMAN ESTATES, IL

DMG MORI USA, INC.

DMG MORI USA, INC. received $448.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+1,012% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $71.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($448.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$448.2K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
T6WMFHV6QN64
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.2MFY2017
  2. 14.9MFY2018
  3. 11.3MFY2019
  4. 31.7MFY2020
  5. 10.2MFY2021
  6. 709.7KFY2022
  7. 271.3KFY2023
  8. 108.2KFY2024
  9. 40.3KFY2025
  10. 448.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$248.2K55%
  2. Equipment maintenance$200K45%

Where the work was performed

  1. Cook County, IL$248.2K55%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $448.2K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $448.2K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Cook County, IL· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 17, 2025 – Dec 16, 2025· W911PT26PA013
  2. Department of the Army· Albany County, NY· Equipment maintenance· Feb 10, 2026 – Feb 10, 2026· W911PT26PA039

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $15.9M (6 subawards)

5 primes

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 subawards
  2. ROCKET CENTER, WV · 1 subaward
  3. COLUMBUS, OH · 1 subaward
  4. TULLAHOMA, TN · 1 subaward
  5. KANSAS CITY, MO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $3.8M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $2.2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $21.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $720.9K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $7.2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $15.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

13 companies · $51.2M reported

  1. FREDERICK, MD · 38 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. RESTON, VA · 2 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. FORT WORTH, TX · 5 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. VINYL TECHNOLOGIES INC$490.1K−92% in FY2026
    FITCHBURG, MA · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Metalworking machinery manufacturingAir Force · Metalworking machinery manufacturing
  2. TRANSPACIFIC ASSOCIATES CO.,LTD$821.5K+33% in FY2026
    BUSAN, KOR · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Metalworking machinery manufacturingArmy · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenanceArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. BIGREP AMERICA, INC.$278.1K−96% in FY2026
    WILMINGTON, MA · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Metalworking machinery manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.