Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

DYNETICS, INC.

DYNETICS, INC. received $1B in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 39 awards (+63% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.5B. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1B).

Obligations · FY2026
$1B
New awards
39
Sole-source
99%
Single offer
1.1%
UEI
FH7ML8E9EWJ7
Parent company
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the LEIDOS, INC. company family: 96 registered entities, $9.8B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. LEIDOS, INC.RESTON, VA · Family page
    $2.3B
  2. QTC MEDICAL SERVICES INCSAN DIMAS, CA
    $2.4B
  3. LEIDOS, INC.RESTON, VA
    $1.1B
  4. LEIDOS, INC.GAITHERSBURG, MD
    $606M
  5. LEIDOS, INC.RESTON, VA
    $589.6M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · jev-1.13.0 · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 78.3MFY2017
  2. 193.9MFY2018
  3. 261.2MFY2019
  4. 394.4MFY2020
  5. 420.1MFY2021
  6. 178.2MFY2022
  7. 117.1MFY2023
  8. 137.1MFY2024
  9. 635.9MFY2025
  10. 1BFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$1B97%
    12 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$21.7M2.1%
    17 awards
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$8.4M0.8%
    3 awards
  4. Federal Acquisition Service$2.8M0.3%
    5 awards
  5. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards
  6. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$1B97%
  2. Professional services$22.6M2.2%
  3. Research & development$11.6M1.1%
  4. Other equipment & supplies$1.9M0.2%

Where the work was performed

  1. Madison County, AL$1B99%
  2. Bexar County, TX$3.4M0.3%
  3. Escambia County, FL$1.8M0.2%
  4. Okaloosa County, FL$1.1M0.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition99.8%
    US 39% · $1B
  • Sole-source awards99%
    US 30% · $1B
  • Single-offer competitions1.1%
    US 8.8% · $11.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Army$1B
    Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$15.6M
    Department of Defense · 4 awards

Largest awards

  1. DO FOR THE FY26 PRODUCTION BUY.$617.2M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 14, 2026 – Apr 14, 2026· W31P4Q26F0067
  2. CHGB TPS NTE AWARD$445.2M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Nov 21, 2024 – May 12, 2026· W31P4Q25C0003
  3. FY25 BUY$356.7M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jul 30, 2025 – Apr 22, 2026· W31P4Q25F0222
  4. UCO - GUAM DEFENSE SYSTEMS$204M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Nov 14, 2024 – Apr 24, 2026· W31P4Q25F0021
  5. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT TO THE WDI DIRECTORATE$161.7M
    Federal Acquisition Service· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Sep 6, 2017 – Jan 28, 2026· GSQ0417DB0102
  6. TEST&EVALUATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR RANGES, ARMAMENTS AND SPECTRUM (TETRAS) MID-PRESSURE ARC HEATER (MPAH) POWER SUPPLY$113.1M
    Department of the Air Force· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Jan 24, 2020 – Jan 30, 2026· FA248720F4913
  7. USFK DO$74.3M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 25, 2025 – Apr 24, 2026· W31P4Q25F0074
  8. GUIDED WEAPONS EVALUATION FACILITY RADIO FREQUENCY MODERNIZATION$56.4M
    Department of the Air Force· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Jan 31, 2020 – May 28, 2026· FA248720F0072

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $163.5M (136 subawards)

80 sub-recipients

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANY$78.6M48%
    TUCSON, AZ · 2 subawards
  2. EXLAR CORPORATION$13.5M8.3%
    CHANHASSEN, MN · 1 subaward
  3. GICHNER SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.$13.5M8.3%
    DALLASTOWN, PA · 1 subaward
  4. DMG MORI USA, INC.$13.2M8.1%
    HOFFMAN ESTATES, IL · 2 subawards
  5. EMBEDDED SYSTEMS INC$7M4.3%
    SIMI VALLEY, CA · 1 subaward
  6. ABACO SYSTEMS, INC.$5.5M3.4%
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 4 subawards
  7. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.$3.5M2.1%
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 3 subawards
  8. USA MACHINE INC.$2.3M1.4%
    ROYSE CITY, TX · 5 subawards
  9. THE WILL-BURT COMPANY$1.6M1.0%
    ORRVILLE, OH · 2 subawards
  10. FORI AUTOMATION, INC.$1.6M1.0%
    SHELBY TOWNSHIP, MI · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $6.4M (12 subawards)

7 primes

  1. BOEING COMPANY, THE$4.4M68%
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 2 subawards
  2. RAYTHEON COMPANY$1.2M19%
    EL SEGUNDO, CA · 2 subawards
  3. BOEING COMPANY, THE$409.2K6.4%
    LAYTON, UT · 3 subawards
  4. SRC INC$174.7K2.7%
    SYRACUSE, NY · 1 subaward
  5. RAYTHEON COMPANY$102.6K1.6%
    TUCSON, AZ · 2 subawards
  6. VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$92.5K1.4%
    NASHVILLE, TN · 1 subaward
  7. KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC$50.8K0.8%
    LANHAM, MD · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 16% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $56.7M paid out · $287.5M received
  • FY2022: $36.4M paid out · $55M received
  • FY2023: $13.2M paid out · $53.1M received
  • FY2024: $29.5M paid out · $79M received
  • FY2025: $73.5M paid out · $34.1M received
  • FY2026: $163.5M paid out · $6.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

3,379 companies · $13.9B reported

  1. SMITHS DETECTION INC.$908.2M
    EDGEWOOD, MD · 9 subawards · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance
  2. CERNER CORPORATION$838.3M
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 118 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORP$354.9M
    RESTON, VA · 540 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

106 companies · $2.9B reported

  1. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$1.1B
    RESTON, VA · 107 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$425.1M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 260 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED$108.4M
    PASCAGOULA, MS · 91 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 201 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$13.3B−22% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 31 entities · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services+13 more
  2. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$13.2B−26% in FY2026
    CHANTILLY, VA · 67 entities · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services+9 more
  3. VETERANS EVALUATION SERVICES, INC$4.8B−19% in FY2026
    HOUSTON, TX · 15% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Offices of physicians

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of LEIDOS, INC. (96 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • LEIDOS, INC.AI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$4.9M
48 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$13.5M
$13.5M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$858.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$2.5M
    39 reports
  2. 2024$3.8M
    40 reports
  3. 2025$4.9M
    48 reports
  4. 2026$2.4M
    23 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense99 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations95 reports
  3. Science and technology41 reports
  4. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code37 reports
  5. Homeland security34 reports
  6. Veterans34 reports
  7. Aerospace27 reports
  8. Energy and nuclear20 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES150 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE144 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)13 reports
  4. Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)13 reports
  5. Transportation - Dept of (DOT)8 reports
  6. Natl Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA)7 reports
  7. Homeland Security - Dept of (DHS)6 reports
  8. Veterans Affairs - Dept of (VA)6 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. The OB-C Group. LLC$910K
    13 reports
  2. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC.$820K
    14 reports
  3. CR Federal$570K
    14 reports
  4. Squire Patton Boggs$540K
    6 reports
  5. CGCN GROUP, LLC$510K
    6 reports
  6. American Defense International, Inc.$460K
    14 reports
  7. TEAM HALLAHAN LLC$420K
    14 reports
  8. 535 GROUP, LLC$420K
    14 reports

11 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$468.5K55%
  2. Democratic$390K45%

PACs sponsored

  • LEIDOS INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$1.5M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.