Federal contractor · MOORPARK, CA

DT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC

DT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC received $41.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 13 awards (+198% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $97.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($36.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$41.3M
New awards
13
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
MJWRR63R3W49
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programHUBZone firm
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 42.5KFY2018
  2. 500FY2019
  3. 112.5KFY2020
  4. 6.6MFY2022
  5. 15.9MFY2023
  6. 19.8MFY2024
  7. 13.9MFY2025
  8. 41.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$36.3M88%
    5 awards
  2. Defense Information Systems Agency$3M7.3%
    1 awards
  3. Bureau of Engraving and Printing$904.4K2.2%
    1 awards
  4. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services$609.5K1.5%
    1 awards
  5. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement$560.9K1.4%
    1 awards
  6. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards
  7. Transportation Security Administration$00.0%
    2 awards
  8. Federal Acquisition Service-$37.8K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$34.7M84%
  2. IT & telecom$6.6M16%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Riverside County, CA$28.6M69%
  2. Ventura County, CA$6.7M16%
  3. District of Columbia, DC$3.9M9.5%
  4. Cumberland County, PA$1.5M3.7%
  5. Los Angeles County, CA$609.5K1.5%
  6. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$37.8K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · -$37.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. TASK ORDER (TO) IS TO PROCURE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, DATA MANAGEMENT, INFORMATION ASSURANCE, AND LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE PA DEPARTMENT (PAD) AT THE NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, CORONA DIVISION.$46.7M
    Department of the Navy· Riverside County, CA· Professional services· Sep 12, 2022 – Jun 2, 2026· N6426722F3007
  2. ENTERPRISE COLLABORATION SERVICES (ECS) II$19M
    Defense Information Systems Agency· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Sep 14, 2022 – Apr 20, 2026· HC102822F6780
  3. MCIWEST REGIONAL RADIO AND RRS SUPPORT$7M
    Federal Acquisition Service· San Diego County, CA· IT & telecom· Sep 21, 2022 – Feb 2, 2026· 47QFPA22F0073
  4. NSWC PHD PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES$6.1M
    Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Professional services· Jan 12, 2026 – May 5, 2026· N6339426F3001
  5. TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT DIVISION AT NSWC CORONA DIVISION.$3.2M
    Department of the Navy· Riverside County, CA· Professional services· Sep 25, 2023 – Jun 4, 2026· N6426723F3007
  6. THIS REQUIREMENT IS TO ACQUIRE SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE CORONA DIVISION'S CORPORATE OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT AND CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICE.$2.3M
    Department of the Navy· Riverside County, CA· Professional services· Jun 12, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· N6426725F3004
  7. MAXIMO SUPPORT SERVICES: THE BUREAU OF ENGRAVING AND PRINTING (BEP) OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, HAS A NEED TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY LABOR AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES TO MAINTAIN AND ENHANCE BEP'S UTILIZATION OF MAXIMO.$2.3M
    Bureau of Engraving and Printing· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Aug 7, 2024 – Jun 12, 2026· 2031ZB24F00059
  8. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL PROVIDE NAVSEA MAINTENANCE, MODERNIZATION AND TECHNICAL DATA INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FOR NAVAL SEA LOGISTICS CENTER (NAVSEALOGCEN).$1.5M
    Department of the Navy· Cumberland County, PA· IT & telecom· Mar 3, 2026 – May 26, 2026· N6572626F3000

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $4.8M reported

  1. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$4.8M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CH2M HILL CLARK NEXSEN ENERGY PARTNERS JV$52.9M−100% in FY2026
    GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ODME SOLUTIONS, LLC$55M−37% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. MNDPI PACIFIC JV$53.4M+65% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.