Federal contractor · CHARLESTON, SC

FATHOM 4 LLC

FATHOM 4 LLC received $12M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−24% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $63.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($12M).

Obligations · FY2026
$12M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
MKKHGNXJA6V9
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. -196.7FY2017
  2. 3.2MFY2018
  3. 3.1MFY2019
  4. 3.1MFY2020
  5. 2.6MFY2021
  6. 581.6KFY2022
  7. 5.3MFY2023
  8. 17.5MFY2024
  9. 15.7MFY2025
  10. 12MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$8.3M69%
  2. Equipment maintenance$3.7M31%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Berkeley County, SC· Professional services· Sep 8, 2023 – May 15, 2026· N6523623F3027
  2. Department of the Navy· Berkeley County, SC· Professional services· Mar 12, 2021 – Mar 16, 2026· N6523621F3008
  3. Department of the Navy· Charleston County, SC· Equipment maintenance· Feb 17, 2026 – Jun 11, 2026· N6523626F3003
  4. Department of the Navy· Berkeley County, SC· Professional services· May 17, 2023 – Jun 5, 2026· N6523623F3018
  5. Department of the Navy· Berkeley County, SC· Professional services· Jun 29, 2022 – Jun 1, 2026· N6523622F3021
  6. Department of the Navy· Charleston County, SC· Equipment maintenance· Feb 17, 2026 – Feb 24, 2026· N6523626F3004

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $1.2M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $381.1K paid out · $8.3M received
  • FY2023: $1.2M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $6.9M paid out · $2.4M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $382K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

5 companies · $9.7M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. STAFFORD, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ATLANTA, GA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $11.1M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 11 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JSL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$45.2M−75% in FY2026
    OXNARD, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ICI SERVICES CORPORATION$45.3M−15% in FY2026
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CALIFORNIA, MD · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.