Federal contractor · WASHINGTON, DC

EARTH WORTH L.L.C.

EARTH WORTH L.L.C. received $1.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+34% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($945.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.3M
New awards
3
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
N18MQLD1JSK1
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned8(a) programHUBZone firm
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 10KFY2017
  2. 103KFY2021
  3. 369.6KFY2022
  4. 172.3KFY2023
  5. 1.1MFY2024
  6. 949.8KFY2025
  7. 1.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$945.5K74%
    1 awards
  2. Departmental Offices$241.7K19%
    1 awards
  3. Bureau of the Fiscal Service$85.2K6.7%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$1.3M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Fairfax County, VA$945.5K74%
  2. District of Columbia, DC$326.9K26%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.3M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $1.3M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Departmental Offices$241.7K
    Department of the Interior · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. GROUNDS MAINTENANCE & EXTERIOR IMPROVE.$2.8M
    Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Facilities & utilities· Dec 22, 2023 – Jan 27, 2026· W912HQ24C0022
  2. WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR AFRH - WASHINGTON, D.C.$624.9K
    Bureau of the Fiscal Service· District of Columbia, DC· Facilities & utilities· Sep 16, 2022 – Jul 24, 2026· 20342322C00018
  3. WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR AFRH - WASHINGTON, DC$241.7K
    Departmental Offices· District of Columbia, DC· Facilities & utilities· Sep 1, 2026 – Sep 2, 2026· 140D0426C0132

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MAEK POONG CO., LTD$2.9M−36% in FY2026
    SEOUL, KOR · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  2. HOPE SERVICES$2.9M+11% in FY2026
    SAN JOSE, CA · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  3. DAEHAN DEVELOPMENT CO.,LTD$2.7M+145% in FY2026
    SEOUL, KOR · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.