Federal contractor · ROCHESTER, NY

EASTMAN KODAK CO

EASTMAN KODAK CO received $112.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+27% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.4M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Engraving and Printing ($93.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$112.3K
New awards
2
Sole-source
83%
Single offer
17%
UEI
EX2TTM9JHVX5
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

5 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $112.3K in FY2026 together.

  1. EASTMAN KODAK COROCHESTER, NY · Family page
    $112.3K
  2. $0
  3. $0
  4. $0
  5. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 987.2KFY2017
  2. 583KFY2018
  3. 336.9KFY2019
  4. 336.4KFY2020
  5. 287.6KFY2021
  6. 238.4KFY2022
  7. 291.9KFY2023
  8. 103.6KFY2024
  9. 88.5KFY2025
  10. 112.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$93.1K83%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$19.1K17%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $112.3K
  • Sole-source awards83%
    US 30% · $93.1K
  • Single-offer competitions17%
    US 8.7% · $19.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Engraving and Printing· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Aug 22, 2025 – Jul 30, 2026· 2031ZA25C00337
  2. National Archives and Records Administration· Prince George's County, MD· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 9, 2026 – Sep 9, 2026· 88310326P00025

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $45.6K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $35.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $1.3M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 19 subawards · Other support services
  2. LAUREL, MD · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TOUR-MATE SYSTEMS CANADA LTD$64.7K+5% in FY2026
    NORTH YORK, CAN · 21% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Engraving and Printing · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance
  2. ANGUIL ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.$756.2K−100% in FY2026
    MILWAUKEE, WI · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Engraving and Printing · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenance
  3. JOPPA, MD · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Engraving and Printing · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance

Showing the top 3 of 22 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of EASTMAN KODAK CO (5 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • EASTMAN KODAK COMPANYAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$40K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$140K
$140K in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$5,500
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$10K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$20K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$40K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$70K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Trade (domestic and foreign)7 reports
  2. Manufacturing6 reports
  3. Chemicals and chemical industry1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES9 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE2 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Democratic$4,00073%
  2. Republican$1,50027%

PACs sponsored

  • EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY EMPLOYEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$7,782 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.