Federal contractor · VIRGINIA BEACH, VA

ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, INC

No contract obligations recorded for ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, INC in FY2026. Since FY2017: $36K.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
YJLNBQ43YHL9
Parent company
XEROX HOLDINGS CORP
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the XEROX CORPORATION company family: 49 registered entities, $66.6M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. XEROX CORPORATIONWASHINGTON, DC · Family page
    $43.9M
  2. $20.4M
  3. $1.7M
  4. XEROX CORPCOPPELL, TX
    $582.8K
  5. $85.4K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. -186.9FY2017
  2. 28.6KFY2018
  3. 1.9KFY2021
  4. 5.7KFY2022
  5. 0FY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, INC in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, INC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$12.3M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 2.7MFY2021
  2. 6.9MFY2022
  3. 1.7MFY2023
  4. 1MFY2024

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2021–FY2024.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $168.5K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $686.8K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $425.4K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $265.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

10 companies · $5.2M reported

  1. SIMI VALLEY, CA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. PASCAGOULA, MS · 71 subawards · Ship and boat building
  3. FORT WORTH, TX · 38 subawards · Other telecommunications

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 108 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 9.9% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing
  2. VIENNA, VA · 7 entities · 7.9% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturingOffices, Boards and Divisions · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturingArmy · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing+5 more
  3. OPTEX SYSTEMS, INC$21.8M−42% in FY2026
    RICHARDSON, TX · 2 entities · 6.4% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of XEROX CORPORATION (49 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • XEROX CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
  • SRI InternationalAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$740K
10 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3.8M
$3.6M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$10K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$1.9M
    14 reports
  2. 2024$1.2M
    12 reports
  3. 2025$740K
    10 reports
  4. 2026$70K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations38 reports
  2. Defense28 reports
  3. Science and technology6 reports
  4. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code6 reports
  5. Energy and nuclear2 reports
  6. Government issues1 reports
  7. Trade (domestic and foreign)1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES38 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE38 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES, LLC$530K
    16 reports
  2. National Group, LLP$160K
    14 reports
  3. Mr. Richard Goodstein$0
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Democratic$5,00050%
  2. Republican$5,00050%

PACs sponsored

  • XEROX CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (XPAC)$3,320 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.