Federal contractor · WASHINGTON, DC

XEROX CORPORATION

XEROX CORPORATION received $43.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 326 awards (−11% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $321.5M. Its largest customer was Office of the Chief Financial Officer ($17.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$43.9M
New awards
326
Sole-source
34%
Single offer
13%
UEI
EFMFNAELHYR5
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

49 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $66.6M in FY2026 together.

  1. XEROX CORPORATIONWASHINGTON, DC · Family page
    $43.9M
  2. $20.4M
  3. $1.7M
  4. XEROX CORPCOPPELL, TX
    $582.7K
  5. $85.4K
  6. $30.4K
  7. $814
  8. $0
  9. $0
  10. $0
  11. $0
  12. $0
  13. $0
  14. COMDOC, INCUNIONTOWN, OH
    $0
  15. $0
  16. $0
  17. $0
  18. $0
  19. $0
  20. $0
Show all 49 members
  1. ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, INCVIRGINIA BEACH, VA
    $0
  2. $0
  3. $0
  4. $0
  5. $0
  6. $0
  7. $0
  8. $0
  9. $0
  10. $0
  11. $0
  12. $0
  13. $0
  14. R. K. DIXON COMPANYDAVENPORT, IA
    $0
  15. SRI INTERNATIONALPALO ALTO, CA
    $0
  16. $0
  17. $0
  18. XEROX CANADA LTDNORTH YORK, CAN
    $0
  19. XEROX CORPORATIONWASHINGTON, DC
    $0
  20. XEROX CORPORATIONSAINT PETERSBURG, FL
    $0
  21. XEROX CORPORATIONANCHORAGE, AK
    $0
  22. XEROX CORPORATIONOKLAHOMA CITY, OK
    $0
  23. $0
  24. $0
  25. $0
  26. XEROX CORPORATIONCHARLOTTE, NC
    -$305
  27. XEROX CORPORATIONPALO ALTO, CA
    -$4,212
  28. XEROX CORPORATIONROSEMONT, IL
    -$30.5K
  29. XEROX CORPORATIONSIGNAL HILL, CA
    -$39.2K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 42MFY2017
  2. 34.5MFY2018
  3. 29.7MFY2019
  4. 26.2MFY2020
  5. 24.1MFY2021
  6. 17.2MFY2022
  7. 21.2MFY2023
  8. 33.3MFY2024
  9. 49.4MFY2025
  10. 43.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 7 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 15 awards
  4. 10 awards
  5. 57 awards
  6. 15 awards
  7. 4 awards
  8. 6 awards
  9. 5 awards
  10. 7 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$33.6M76%
  2. Professional services$4M9.1%
  3. Equipment maintenance$3.3M7.5%
  4. Other equipment & supplies$3M6.8%
  5. Health & medical$48.8K0.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition47%
    US 39% · $20.5M
  • Sole-source awards34%
    US 30% · $14.7M
  • Single-offer competitions13%
    US 8.7% · $5.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. District of Columbia Courts · 2 awards
  2. Department of Homeland Security · 1 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Office of the Chief Financial Officer· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Apr 25, 2022 – Aug 12, 2026· 12314422F0254
  2. Internal Revenue Service· Prince George's County, MD· IT & telecom· May 31, 2024 – Sep 24, 2026· 2032H524C00041
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs· Cecil County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Dec 30, 2021 – Mar 3, 2026· 36C24522F0134
  4. Federal Bureau of Investigation· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 28, 2020 – Sep 22, 2026· 15F06720F0003135
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Cecil County, MD· Professional services· Oct 1, 2016 – Dec 18, 2025· VA24516F0558
  6. Federal Acquisition Service· Prince George's County, MD· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 16, 2022 – Apr 16, 2026· 47QSMA22F0077
  7. Departmental Offices· Jefferson County, CO· Professional services· Apr 10, 2020 – Apr 15, 2026· 140D7020F0043
  8. Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· May 30, 2024 – May 29, 2026· N5005424F1012

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $382.7K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $48.4K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · -$44.4K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $163.9K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $43.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

11 companies · $5.2M reported

  1. SIMI VALLEY, CA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. PASCAGOULA, MS · 71 subawards · Ship and boat building
  3. FORT WORTH, TX · 38 subawards · Other telecommunications

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 108 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 9.9% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing
  2. VIENNA, VA · 7 entities · 7.9% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturingOffices, Boards and Divisions · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturingArmy · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing+5 more
  3. OPTEX SYSTEMS, INC$21.8M−42% in FY2026
    RICHARDSON, TX · 2 entities · 6.4% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of XEROX CORPORATION (49 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • XEROX CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
  • SRI InternationalAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$740K
10 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3.9M
$3.6M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$10K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$1.9M
    14 reports
  2. 2024$1.2M
    12 reports
  3. 2025$740K
    10 reports
  4. 2026$80K
    7 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations38 reports
  2. Defense28 reports
  3. Science and technology6 reports
  4. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code6 reports
  5. Energy and nuclear2 reports
  6. Government issues2 reports
  7. Trade (domestic and foreign)1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES39 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE39 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES, LLC$530K
    16 reports
  2. National Group, LLP$170K
    15 reports
  3. Mr. Richard Goodstein$0
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Democratic$5,00050%
  2. Republican$5,00050%

PACs sponsored

  • XEROX CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (XPAC)$3,320 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.