Federal contractor · PITTSBURGH, PA

EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES LLC

EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES LLC received $7.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 145 awards (−14% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $45.5M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($5.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$7.1M
New awards
145
Sole-source
63%
Single offer
15%
UEI
HA3GWLK3JK58
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

12 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $9.3M in FY2026 together.

  1. EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES LLCPITTSBURGH, PA · Family page
    $7.1M
  2. $819.9K
  3. $421.3K
  4. $366.5K
  5. EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES LLCCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO
    $257.7K
  6. $157.1K
  7. $107.2K
  8. $94.4K
  9. $89.7K
  10. $0
  11. $0
  12. -$23.9K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.2MFY2017
  2. 1.2MFY2018
  3. 767.5KFY2019
  4. 1.3MFY2020
  5. 4.7MFY2021
  6. 6.5MFY2022
  7. 7.5MFY2023
  8. 7MFY2024
  9. 8.2MFY2025
  10. 7.1MFY2026
  11. 145.9KFY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 106 awards
  2. 11 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 2 awards
  5. 3 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 2 awards
  9. 3 awards
  10. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$4.9M69%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$747.2K11%
  3. Professional services$700.6K9.9%
  4. Health & medical$455.4K6.5%
  5. Construction & real property$185.5K2.6%
  6. Facilities & utilities$54.9K0.8%
  7. Research & development$14.8K0.2%
  8. IT & telecom$12.8K0.2%

Where the work was performed

  1. Cook County, IL$703.8K10.0%
  2. Duval County, FL$299.5K4.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition78%
    US 39% · $5.5M
  • Sole-source awards63%
    US 30% · $4.4M
  • Single-offer competitions15%
    US 8.8% · $1.1M
  • Urgency justifications2.4%
    US 5.1% · $166.4K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 26 awards
  2. General Services Administration · 1 awards
  3. Department of Health and Human Services · 1 awards
  4. Department of Defense · 2 awards
  5. Department of Commerce · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Adams County, CO· Equipment maintenance· Jul 23, 2021 – Jul 21, 2026· 36C25921C0121
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs· Charleston County, SC· Equipment maintenance· Jul 7, 2022 – Apr 21, 2026· 36C24722N0371
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs· Cook County, IL· Equipment maintenance· Jan 5, 2021 – Aug 14, 2026· 36C25221N0098
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· Cook County, IL· Professional services· Feb 27, 2025 – Jun 28, 2026· 36C25225P0296
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Bernalillo County, NM· Equipment maintenance· Dec 23, 2022 – Sep 12, 2026· 36C26223C0043
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs· Salt Lake County, UT· Equipment maintenance· Jul 25, 2022 – Jun 25, 2026· 36C25922P0791
  7. Department of the Air Force· Harrison County, MS· Equipment maintenance· Dec 23, 2020 – Jan 23, 2026· FA301021P0009
  8. Department of Veterans Affairs· Philadelphia County, PA· Equipment maintenance· Jan 28, 2021 – Jul 17, 2026· 36C24421F0154

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.1M (8 subawards)

3 primes

  1. PASCAGOULA, MS · 5 subawards
  2. TULLAHOMA, TN · 2 subawards
  3. BROOMFIELD, CO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $5.4M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $2.4M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

29 companies · $43.7M reported

  1. PASCAGOULA, MS · 40 subawards · Ship and boat building
  2. LOS ANGELES, CA · 2 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. GROTON, CT · 30 subawards · Ship and boat building

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 86 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SUSTAINMENT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$28.5M−1.7% in FY2026
    BRYAN, TX · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenanceVeterans Affairs · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenanceArmy · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance+4 more
  2. PUNTA GORDA, FL · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenanceVeterans Affairs · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenanceVeterans Affairs · Medical equipment and supplies manufacturing+1 more
  3. COOPER CITY, FL · 17% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenanceDefense Health Agency · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenanceArmy · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES LLC (12 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIESAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2023
$230K
6 reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$230K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations4 reports
  2. Defense4 reports
  3. Environment and Superfund4 reports
  4. Transportation4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES4 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Whitmer & Worrall, LLC$110K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.