Federal contractor · CHARLOTTE, NC
FORMS & SUPPLY, INC.
FORMS & SUPPLY, INC. received $4.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 30 awards (−55% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $53.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($3.4M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $4.1M
- New awards
- 30
- Sole-source
- 1.1%
- Single offer
- 2.4%
- UEI
- MWJJQMK5JNH1
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 872.1KFY2017
- 1.6MFY2018
- 3.6MFY2019
- 3.3MFY2020
- 740.4KFY2021
- 5.1MFY2022
- 6MFY2023
- 19.3MFY2024
- 9.1MFY2025
- 4.1MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$3.4M84%14 awards
- Department of the Air Force$224.3K5.5%3 awards
- Department of the Navy$138K3.4%6 awards
- 1 awards
- Departmental Offices$80.7K2.0%2 awards
- Agricultural Research Service$68.4K1.7%1 awards
- Federal Acquisition Service$39.1K1.0%1 awards
- 1 awards
- 1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Equipment maintenance$2.9M69%
- Other equipment & supplies$1.2M30%
- Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$25.6K0.6%
Where the work was performed
- Abroad$3.2M77%
- Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK$160.4K3.9%
- Mecklenburg County, NC$152.5K3.7%
- Sumter County, SC$120.9K2.9%
- St. Louis city, MO$90.4K2.2%
- King George County, VA$81.1K2.0%
- Maricopa County, AZ$80.3K2.0%
- Norfolk city, VA$69.6K1.7%
- Lee County, AL$68.4K1.7%
- Tarrant County, TX$62.3K1.5%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition3.5%US 39% · $142.7K
- Sole-source awards1.1%US 30% · $44K
- Single-offer competitions2.4%US 8.7% · $98.6K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of Defense · 1 awards
Largest awards
- ROOM 186$449KDepartment of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 11, 2025 – Dec 18, 2025· N0018925F0188
- Department of the Army· Jefferson County, KY· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 25, 2025 – Mar 9, 2026· W912QR25FA171
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $60.6K received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $4.9M received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
3 companies · $5M reported
- BIRMINGHAM, AL · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
- RQ CONSTRUCTION, LLC$146.9KCARLSBAD, CA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
- SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 13 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- OFFICEIMAGES INC$16.6M−44% in FY2026ROSWELL, GA · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturingAir Force · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturing
- TRADE PRODUCTS CORP.$18.3M−69% in FY2026FAIRFAX, VA · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturingAir Force · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturingNavy · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturing
- AFFORDABLE INTERIOR SYSTEMS, INC.$11.1M+21% in FY2026LEOMINSTER, MA · 3 entities · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturingNavy · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturingAir Force · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturing
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.