Federal contractor · DETROIT, MI

GENERAL MOTORS LLC

GENERAL MOTORS LLC received $64.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+215% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $139.3M. Its largest customer was U.S. Secret Service ($64.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$64.2M
New awards
5
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GLKRGLDDWFA4
Parent company
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the GENERAL MOTORS LLC company family: 11 registered entities, $888.2M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. GENERAL MOTORS LLCWARREN, MI · Family page
    $652.9M
  2. GM DEFENSE LLCDETROIT, MI
    $169.8M
  3. GM DEFENSE LLCCONCORD, NC
    $602.6K
  4. GENERAL MOTORS LLCWARREN, MI
    $479.2K
  5. GENERAL MOTORS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPNEW YORK, NY
    $150K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-07

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 13.2MFY2017
  2. 10MFY2018
  3. 8.6MFY2019
  4. 6.1MFY2020
  5. 1.1MFY2021
  6. 882.3KFY2022
  7. 0FY2023
  8. 14.8MFY2024
  9. 20.4MFY2025
  10. 64.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. U.S. Secret Service$64.2M100%
    5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$64.2M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Macomb County, MI$64.2M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $64.2M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $64.2M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. U.S. Secret Service$64.2M
    Department of Homeland Security · 4 awards

Largest awards

  1. NEXT GENERATION LIMOUSINES (NGL4).$41M
    U.S. Secret Service· Macomb County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 16, 2024 – Jul 29, 2026· 70US0924C70092305
  2. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ORDER IS TO PROCURE SHIELD VEHICLES OFF AN EXISTING IDIQ.$30.1M
    U.S. Secret Service· Macomb County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 21, 2026 – Sep 21, 2026· 70US0926F3OTH3117
  3. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ORDER IS TO PROCURE SHIELD VEHICLES OFF AN EXISTING IDIQ.$17.8M
    U.S. Secret Service· Macomb County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 22, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· 70US0926F3OTH3137
  4. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ORDER IS TO PROCURE SHIELD VEHICLES OFF AN EXISTING IDIQ.$3.1M
    U.S. Secret Service· Macomb County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 22, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· 70US0926F3OTH3135
  5. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ORDER IS TO PROCURE DEFENSE SHIELD VEHICLES OFF AN EXISTING IDIQ.$508.1K
    U.S. Secret Service· Macomb County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 22, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· 70US0926F3OTH3142

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

18 companies · $22.8M reported

  1. SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, INC.$9.2M
    BIRMINGHAM, AL · 1 subaward
  2. PROTON ENERGY SYSTEMS INC$2.6M
    WALLINGFORD, CT · 1 subaward
  3. SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES, LLC$2.2M
    SCOTTSDALE, AZ · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

12 companies · $44.7M reported

  1. OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLC$39.9M
    OSHKOSH, WI · 2 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  2. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO$1.2M
    LA JOLLA, CA · 2 subawards
  3. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$744.4K
    MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 28 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FCA US LLC$1.1B+110% in FY2026
    AUBURN HILLS, MI · 2 entities · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Motor vehicle manufacturing
  2. FLEET VEHICLE SOURCE INC$1.1B+16% in FY2026
    LAS VEGAS, NV · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Motor vehicle manufacturing
  3. FORD MOTOR CO$1.8B+63% in FY2026
    DEARBORN, MI · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Motor vehicle manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of GENERAL MOTORS LLC (11 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • GENERAL MOTORS COMPANYAI match · 100%
  • GM Defense, LLCAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$19.6M
70 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$61.1M
$61.1M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$684K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$13M
    67 reports
  2. 2024$13.7M
    64 reports
  3. 2025$19.6M
    70 reports
  4. 2026$14.8M
    36 reports

Top issues

  1. Automotive industry177 reports
  2. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code87 reports
  3. Trade (domestic and foreign)52 reports
  4. Manufacturing43 reports
  5. Defense42 reports
  6. Environment and Superfund39 reports
  7. Financial institutions, investments and securities32 reports
  8. Computer industry28 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES231 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE216 reports
  3. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)21 reports
  4. Defense - Dept of (DOD)21 reports
  5. Treasury - Dept of21 reports
  6. U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)20 reports
  7. Transportation - Dept of (DOT)19 reports
  8. Executive Office of the President (EOP)18 reports
  9. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)14 reports
  10. Natl Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Fierce Government Relations$880K
    14 reports
  2. The Washington Tax & Public Policy Group$860K
    14 reports
  3. Ervin Graves Strategy Group, LLC$840K
    14 reports
  4. Roberti Global (fka Roberti White, LLC)$720K
    10 reports
  5. ELEVATE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC$700K
    14 reports
  6. RESOLUTION PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC$620K
    14 reports
  7. Polaris-Hutton Group, LLC$570K
    14 reports
  8. The Williams Group$542.5K
    14 reports

20 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Democratic$363K53%
  2. Republican$318.5K47%
  3. Other or none$2,5000.4%

PACs sponsored

  • GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (GM PAC)$2.2M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 7, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.