Federal contractor · OSHKOSH, WI

OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLC

OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLC received $761.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4,488 awards (−49% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $17.5B. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($534.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$761.2M
New awards
4,488
Sole-source
38%
Single offer
1.3%
UEI
ZMXAHH8M8VL8
Parent company
OSHKOSH CORP
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

12 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $865.2M in FY2026 together.

  1. OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLCOSHKOSH, WI · Family page
    $761.2M
  2. $72.9M
  3. $30.9M
  4. $78.5K
  5. OSHKOSH CORPOSHKOSH, WI
    $7,377
  6. $0
  7. JLG INDUSTRIES INCMC CONNELLSBURG, PA
    $0
  8. $0
  9. $0
  10. $0
  11. $0
  12. OSHKOSH HD, LLCOSHKOSH, WI
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.5BFY2017
  2. 1.5BFY2018
  3. 2.7BFY2019
  4. 2.4BFY2020
  5. 2.2BFY2021
  6. 1.6BFY2022
  7. 2BFY2023
  8. 1.3BFY2024
  9. 1.5BFY2025
  10. 761.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 128 awards
  2. 14 awards
  3. 4,344 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$670M88%
  2. Professional services$61.3M8.1%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$29.2M3.8%
  4. Equipment maintenance$532.2K0.1%
  5. Fuel$26.8K0.0%
  6. Education & social services$26.7K0.0%
  7. IT & telecom$26.1K0.0%
  8. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition39%
    US 39% · $297.8M
  • Sole-source awards38%
    US 30% · $287.6M
  • Single-offer competitions1.3%
    US 8.7% · $10.2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 17 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1,528 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Winnebago County, WI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Oct 12, 2016 – Apr 20, 2026· W56HZV15C0095
  2. Department of the Army· Winnebago County, WI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 13, 2020 – Apr 20, 2026· W56HZV20C0050
  3. Department of the Army· Winnebago County, WI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 15, 2023 – Apr 20, 2026· W56HZV23C0081
  4. Department of the Army· Winnebago County, WI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Feb 4, 2025 – Jan 27, 2026· W912CH25F0168
  5. Department of the Army· Winnebago County, WI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jul 20, 2021 – Jun 3, 2026· W56HZV21F0329
  6. Department of the Army· Winnebago County, WI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 24, 2024 – Jun 3, 2026· W912CH24F0082
  7. Department of the Army· Winnebago County, WI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 8, 2023 – Feb 13, 2026· W56HZV23F0182
  8. Department of the Army· Winnebago County, WI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 5, 2024 – Apr 17, 2026· W912CH24F0085

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $150.5M (2,142 subawards)

173 sub-recipients

  1. IRVING, TX · 141 subawards
  2. TROY, MI · 104 subawards
  3. INDIANAPOLIS, IN · 110 subawards
  4. CLARKSBURG, MD · 14 subawards
  5. MANDO AMERICAN CORP$5.3M3.5%
    OPELIKA, AL · 15 subawards
  6. HAIFA, ISR · 11 subawards
  7. BENDIX COMMERCIAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LLC$4.1M2.7%
    AVON, OH · 61 subawards
  8. DANA INCORPORATED$4.1M2.7%
    MAUMEE, OH · 119 subawards
  9. R. H. SHEPPARD CO., INC.$4M2.6%
    HANOVER, PA · 85 subawards
  10. HIAB USA INC$3.2M2.1%
    PERRYSBURG, OH · 5 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $4.5M (13 subawards)

3 primes

  1. HERNDON, VA · 11 subawards
  2. RAYTHEON COMPANY$201.5K4.5%
    ANDOVER, MA · 1 subaward
  3. HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 20% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $721.7M paid out · $49.5M received
  • FY2022: $1B paid out · $5M received
  • FY2023: $853.6M paid out · $17.7M received
  • FY2024: $745.7M paid out · $96.4M received
  • FY2025: $331.7M paid out · $65M received
  • FY2026: $150.5M paid out · $4.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

491 companies · $3.8B reported

  1. HAIFA, ISR · 124 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  2. HAMILTON, OH · 1,227 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  3. IRVING, TX · 1,137 subawards · Motor vehicle body and trailer manufacturing

Primes that pay it

23 companies · $282.8M reported

  1. SOUTH BEND, IN · 1 subaward · Motor vehicle body and trailer manufacturing
  2. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 10 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. FORT WORTH, TX · 29 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 89 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AM GENERAL LLC$2.5B−89% in FY2026
    SOUTH BEND, IN · 2 entities · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Motor vehicle body and trailer manufacturingArmy · Other transportation equipment manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Engine, turbine, and power transmission equipment manufacturing+3 more
  2. AMERICAN RHEINMETALL VEHICLES, LLC$569.2M−40% in FY2026
    AUBURN HILLS, MI · 6 entities · 13% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  3. CANADIAN COMMERCIAL CORPORATION$3.3B−42% in FY2026
    OTTAWA, CAN · 16% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other transportation equipment manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLC (12 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • OSHKOSH CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
  • John Bean Technologies CorporationAI match · 99%
  • John Bean Technologies (JBT) CorporationAI match · 97%
  • Pratt Miller EngineeringAI match · 94%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.5M
18 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3.8M
$2.6M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$160K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$650K
    31 reports
  2. 2024$440K
    14 reports
  3. 2025$1.5M
    18 reports
  4. 2026$1.3M
    10 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense42 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations16 reports
  3. Manufacturing15 reports
  4. Aviation, aircraft and airlines13 reports
  5. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code11 reports
  6. Trade (domestic and foreign)11 reports
  7. Postal9 reports
  8. Copyright, patent and trademark6 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES64 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE56 reports
  3. U.S. Marines3 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Strategic Marketing Innovations$740K
    14 reports
  2. J.A. Green and Company (formerly LLC)$670K
    14 reports
  3. S-3 Group$340K
    6 reports
  4. Thorn Run Partners$280K
    7 reports
  5. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$250K
    12 reports
  6. The Doerrer Group LLC$80K
    4 reports
  7. K&L GATES LLP$70K
    4 reports
  8. Harpley CS, LLC$40K
    4 reports

9 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$146K91%
  2. Democratic$14K8.8%

PACs sponsored

  • OSHKOSH CORPORATION EMPLOYEES PAC (OCEPAC)$177.3K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.