Federal contractor · ROCKVILLE, MD

GLOTECH, INC.

GLOTECH, INC. received $3.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+470% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $21.4M. Its largest customer was Social Security Administration ($2.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.1M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
F2DPFWRULBM4
Small businessMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.1MFY2017
  2. 2.8MFY2018
  3. 1.2MFY2019
  4. 2.3MFY2020
  5. 1.9MFY2021
  6. 2.6MFY2022
  7. 3.4MFY2023
  8. 1.5MFY2024
  9. 543.1KFY2025
  10. 3.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 4 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$2.2M71%
  2. Professional services$896.7K29%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$897.2K29%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $500
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $500
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Professional services· Nov 18, 2020 – Oct 22, 2025· N0003921F4002
  2. Social Security Administration· Baltimore city, MD· Equipment maintenance· Apr 15, 2026 – Jun 25, 2026· 28321326C00060002
  3. Department of the Navy· Professional services· Jan 29, 2026 – Mar 10, 2026· N0003926F3000
  4. Department of State· Professional services· Sep 30, 2024 – Mar 4, 2026· 19AQMM24F2564
  5. Department of the Navy· Portsmouth city, VA· Equipment maintenance· May 4, 2026 – May 4, 2026· N4215826FTE01
  6. Department of the Navy· Shelby County, AL· Professional services· Jul 22, 2019 – May 14, 2026· N0017819F7722

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $3.9M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $2.6M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $238.1K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $629.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $9.2M reported

  1. CHESAPEAKE, VA · 11 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. GROTON, CT · 5 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. GREENVILLE, TX · 1 subaward · Ship and boat building

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MULTI-MAC JV$3M−89% in FY2026
    YUMA, AZ · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. TRIBOLOGIK CORP$3.2M−99% in FY2026
    HAMMOND, IN · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CLAREMONT, CA · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.