Federal contractor · COLUMBIA, MD

GP STRATEGIES CORPORATION

GP STRATEGIES CORPORATION received -$4,150 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards. Since FY2017: $84.5M. Its largest customer was Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
-$4,150
New awards
6
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
GLRVV6FC6DB3
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, -$4,150 in FY2026 together.

  1. GP STRATEGIES CORPORATIONCOLUMBIA, MD · Family page
    -$4,150
  2. PERFORMTECH INC.ALEXANDRIA, VA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 21.3MFY2017
  2. 28.3MFY2018
  3. 22.7MFY2019
  4. 8.1MFY2020
  5. 1.9MFY2021
  6. 1MFY2022
  7. 1.1MFY2023
  8. 806.6KFY2024
  9. -750.2KFY2025
  10. -4.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration· Montgomery County, MD· IT & telecom· Oct 1, 2016 – Jun 1, 2026· HHSP23337002
  2. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration· Montgomery County, MD· IT & telecom· Feb 15, 2018 – Apr 28, 2026· HHSP23337001
  3. National Institutes of Health· Howard County, MD· Professional services· Mar 1, 2022 – Sep 11, 2026· 75N98022F00124
  4. Federal Highway Administration· Arlington County, VA· Education & social services· Mar 27, 2018 – May 8, 2026· 693JJ318F000094
  5. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources· Montgomery County, MD· IT & telecom· Aug 30, 2024 – Oct 8, 2025· 75N99024P00108
  6. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration· Howard County, MD· IT & telecom· Sep 6, 2018 – Apr 13, 2026· 75P00118F37003

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $65.7K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $290.7K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $6.9M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $262.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $7.6M reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 19 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 7 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. GERMANTOWN, MD · 1 subaward · Educational support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MIDWEST ENGINEERING INC$52K−38% in FY2026
    WICHITA, KS · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SAN BERNARDINO, CA · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. BISMARCK, ND · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources · Business schools and computer and management training

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.