Federal contractor · ALEXANDRIA, VA

PERFORMTECH INC.

No contract obligations recorded for PERFORMTECH INC. in FY2026. Since FY2017: -$1.8M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
CEY5J657GPT8
Parent company
GP STRATEGIES CORPORATION
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the GP STRATEGIES CORPORATION company family: 2 registered entities, -$4,150 in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. GP STRATEGIES CORPORATIONCOLUMBIA, MD · Family page
    -$4,150

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. -80.8KFY2017
  2. -10.4KFY2018
  3. -1.7MFY2020

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for PERFORMTECH INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $7.6M reported

  1. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$7.3M
    GROTON, CT · 19 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$164.7K
    FORT WORTH, TX · 7 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. PTG INTERNATIONAL, INC.$65.7K
    GERMANTOWN, MD · 1 subaward · Educational support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MIDWEST ENGINEERING INC$52K−38% in FY2026
    WICHITA, KS · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. NTS LABS, LLC$50K
    SAN BERNARDINO, CA · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. VIDMAR CONSULTING, LLC$63.9K
    BISMARCK, ND · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources · Business schools and computer and management training

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.