Federal contractor · KITA-KU

GROOOVE CO., LTD

GROOOVE CO., LTD received $5,849 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−100% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $2.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($5,849).

Obligations · FY2026
$5,849
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
L5XUZWYQ8Z33
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $5,849 in FY2026 together.

  1. GROOOVE CO., LTDKITA-KU, JPN · Family page
    $5,849
  2. GROOOVE CO., LTD.FUSSA-SHI, JPN
    $0
  3. GROOOVE CO., LTD.HAMURA, JPN
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 230.1KFY2023
  2. 555.3KFY2024
  3. 1.8MFY2025
  4. 5.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$5,849100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$5,849100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$5,849100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. INSTALLATION AND PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT FOR THE PREMISE WIRING UPGRADE OF BLDG 950, YOKOTA AIR BASE, JAPAN$216.1K
    Department of the Air Force· Equipment maintenance· Sep 4, 2025 – Nov 4, 2025· FA520925P0084
  2. NETWORK CABLE INSTALLATION AT YOKOTA AIR BASE, JAPAN$5,849
    Department of the Air Force· Equipment maintenance· Oct 1, 2025 – Oct 1, 2025· FA520926F5004

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $149.8K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$149.8K100%
    SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $149.8K reported

  1. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.$149.8K
    GREENVILLE, TX · 1 subaward · Communications equipment manufacturing

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GUARDIAN CONSTRUCTION INC$2.1M−100% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Building equipment contractors
  2. NORTHERN ELECTRIC INC$2.6M−100% in FY2026
    ASHLAND, ME · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Building equipment contractors
  3. BLUE OAK PROJECTS, LLC$2.8M
    WINCHESTER, TN · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Building equipment contractors

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.