Federal contractor · SALT LAKE CITY, UT

L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. received $380.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 240 awards (−33% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.2B. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($202.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$380.7M
New awards
240
Sole-source
48%
Single offer
10%
UEI
FRJQGQHDX4J3
Parent company
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. company family: 154 registered entities, $6.1B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.GREENVILLE, TX · Family page
    $1.2B
  2. HARRIS CORPORATIONPOTTSTOWN, PA
    $1B
  3. L3HARRIS GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.ROCHESTER, NY
    $460.4M
  4. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.WACO, TX
    $377.5M
  5. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.PALM BAY, FL
    $359.3M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 377.6MFY2017
  2. 571.3MFY2018
  3. 515.3MFY2019
  4. 481.3MFY2020
  5. 617.3MFY2021
  6. 449.9MFY2022
  7. 662.4MFY2023
  8. 613.4MFY2024
  9. 570.1MFY2025
  10. 380.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$202.5M53%
    135 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$92.3M24%
    46 awards
  3. Federal Acquisition Service$53.2M14%
    24 awards
  4. Department of the Army$30.6M8.0%
    19 awards
  5. Defense Logistics Agency$2.5M0.7%
    13 awards
  6. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards
  7. Defense Contract Management Agency-$381.5K0.0%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$128.4M34%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$90.7M24%
  3. Professional services$85.6M22%
  4. IT & telecom$39.5M10%
  5. Equipment maintenance$24M6.3%
  6. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$12.4M3.3%

Where the work was performed

  1. Salt Lake County, UT$292.7M77%
  2. San Diego County, CA$21.3M5.6%
  3. Hillsborough County, FL$16.8M4.4%
  4. Middlesex County, MA$16.3M4.3%
  5. Stafford County, VA$15.7M4.1%
  6. Madison County, AL$8.7M2.3%
  7. Berkeley County, SC$4M1.0%
  8. Abroad$2M0.5%
  9. Lawrence County, IN$1M0.3%
  10. Davis County, UT$998.3K0.3%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition58%
    US 39% · $220.5M
  • Sole-source awards48%
    US 30% · $181.3M
  • Single-offer competitions10%
    US 8.8% · $39.2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Air Force$86.4M
    Department of Defense · 15 awards
  2. Department of the Army$30.6M
    Department of Defense · 7 awards
  3. Department of the Navy$9M
    Department of Defense · 30 awards
  4. Defense Logistics Agency$2.5M
    Department of Defense · 4 awards

Largest awards

  1. NGJ LB CB1 DEVELOPMENT$265.1M
    Department of the Navy· Salt Lake County, UT· Research & development· Aug 26, 2024 – May 11, 2026· N0001924C0061
  2. AN/SRQ-4S, MAINTENANCE ASSISTANCE MODULES, ON-BOARD REPAIR PARTS, AUTOLOADERS AND NON-RECURRING ENGINEERING$107.8M
    Department of the Navy· Salt Lake County, UT· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 26, 2018 – Jun 12, 2026· N0001918C1030
  3. MIDS JTRS TERMINAL PRODUCTION$81M
    Department of the Navy· Salt Lake County, UT· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 17, 2025 – Jun 3, 2026· N0003925F4046
  4. MANUFACTURE, TEST, DELIVERY, MANAGEMENT, AND SUPPORT OF AN/SRQ-4 RADIO TERMINAL SETS FOR SMALL SURFACE COMBATANTS$70.5M
    Department of the Navy· Salt Lake County, UT· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 21, 2023 – Mar 30, 2026· N0002423C5206
  5. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ORDER IS TO PROCURE HARDWARE AND SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE USG, QATAR ARMED FORCES, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES (UAE), THE UNITED KINGDOM, THE ROYAL MAROCCAN AIR FORCE, AND THE ROYAL NETHERLANDS LAND AIR FORCES (RNLAF$62.8M
    Department of the Army· Salt Lake County, UT· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 17, 2020 – May 13, 2026· W58RGZ21F0144
  6. MQ-9 REAPER: COMMMUNICATION REAPER INTEGRATED UPGRADE SOLUTIONS - SATELLITE COMMUNICATION (SATCOM) DIMINISHED MANUFACTURING SOURCE UPGRADES$52.2M
    Department of the Air Force· Salt Lake County, UT· IT & telecom· Mar 30, 2023 – Apr 21, 2026· FA868923F2003
  7. L3 SOLE SOURCE IDIQ TO35 MCSC LINK 16$46.8M
    Federal Acquisition Service· Stafford County, VA· IT & telecom· Jun 27, 2024 – Jun 1, 2026· 47QFLA24F0097
  8. L3 SOLE SOURCE IDIQ TO3 USSOCOM SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS$39M
    Federal Acquisition Service· Hillsborough County, FL· Professional services· Sep 17, 2020 – Jul 20, 2026· 47QFLA20F0281

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $66.3M (140 subawards)

63 sub-recipients

  1. NORTH STAR SCIENTIFIC CORP$8.7M13%
    KAPOLEI, HI · 1 subaward
  2. REGAL TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC.$7.7M12%
    SANTA ANA, CA · 6 subawards
  3. ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC.$6.8M10%
    CEDAR RAPIDS, IA · 2 subawards
  4. CREATION TECHNOLOGIES IDAHO INC.$6.3M9.6%
    MERIDIAN, ID · 21 subawards
  5. TEVET LLC$4.4M6.6%
    GREENEVILLE, TN · 8 subawards
  6. SECURE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.$3.8M5.8%
    SANTA ANA, CA · 4 subawards
  7. CAES MISSION SYSTEMS LLC$3.1M4.7%
    LANCASTER, PA · 2 subawards
  8. CFD RESEARCH CORPORATION$3.1M4.6%
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 subawards
  9. AVNET INC$2.9M4.4%
    PHOENIX, AZ · 5 subawards
  10. VANGUARD EMS INC$2.6M3.9%
    BEAVERTON, OR · 6 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $66.9M (60 subawards)

8 primes

  1. GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.$32.8M49%
    POWAY, CA · 11 subawards
  2. THE BOEING COMPANY$29.7M44%
    MESA, AZ · 1 subaward
  3. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$2.3M3.5%
    ROY, UT · 1 subaward
  4. SALIENT CRGT, INC.$656.3K1.0%
    FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
  5. L-3 COMMUNICATIONS INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.$588.4K0.9%
    GREENVILLE, TX · 2 subawards
  6. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$515.2K0.8%
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 37 subawards
  7. SIERRA NEVADA CORPORATION$231.5K0.3%
    SPARKS, NV · 1 subaward
  8. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$69.9K0.1%
    MELBOURNE, FL · 6 subawards

Its reported sub-contracts equal 17% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $77.4M paid out · $510.2M received
  • FY2022: $22M paid out · $146.7M received
  • FY2023: $142.9M paid out · $232.1M received
  • FY2024: $122.3M paid out · $251.1M received
  • FY2025: $209.7M paid out · $68.7M received
  • FY2026: $66.3M paid out · $66.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1,936 companies · $39.2T reported

  1. CPI RADANT TECHNOLOGIES DIVISION INC.$39.2T
    STOW, MA · 63 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. USA MACHINE INC.$3.9B
    ROYSE CITY, TX · 20 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$188.3M
    TUCSON, AZ · 268 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes that pay it

121 companies · $33.5B reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$16.4B
    FORT WORTH, TX · 3,138 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$7.6B
    MELBOURNE, FL · 622 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$5B
    TUCSON, AZ · 377 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 213 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$41.6B−14% in FY2026
    MELBOURNE, FL · 159 entities · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services+10 more
  2. SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC$7.1B−18% in FY2026
    SPARKS, NV · 18 entities · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingArmy · Communications equipment manufacturing+2 more
  3. BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$22.3B−44% in FY2026
    YORK, PA · 84 entities · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+9 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. (154 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Harris CorporationAI match · 100%
  • Jariet TechnologiesAI match · 100%
  • L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.AI match · 100%
  • L-3 Technologies, Inc.AI match · 99%
  • L3 Harris Technologies, Inc.AI match · 99%
  • NV5 GeospatialAI match · 99%
  • AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INCAI match · 98%
  • L-3 Harris Technologies Inc.AI match · 98%
Lobbying · 2025
$2.1M
38 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$8.8M
$8.8M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$777.5K
2 PACs

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$2.9M
    44 reports
  2. 2024$2.3M
    32 reports
  3. 2025$2.1M
    38 reports
  4. 2026$1.5M
    18 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense92 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations58 reports
  3. Science and technology43 reports
  4. Transportation28 reports
  5. Aerospace17 reports
  6. Aviation, aircraft and airlines15 reports
  7. Intelligence and surveillance14 reports
  8. Natural resources14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES93 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE90 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)43 reports
  4. Army - Dept of (Corps of Engineers)28 reports
  5. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)22 reports
  6. Natl Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)21 reports
  7. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)18 reports
  8. Homeland Security - Dept of (DHS)15 reports
  9. Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)14 reports
  10. Economic Development Administration14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Federal Science Partners LLC$700K
    14 reports
  2. American Defense International, Inc.$520K
    12 reports
  3. The McKeon Group, Inc.$360K
    11 reports
  4. The Nickles Group, LLC$350K
    5 reports
  5. Velocity Government Relations, LLC$297.7K
    12 reports
  6. McAllister & Quinn, LLC$210K
    6 reports
  7. BALLARD PARTNERS$190K
    8 reports
  8. Ervin Graves Strategy Group, LLC$190K
    4 reports

14 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$429K55%
  2. Democratic$345.5K44%
  3. Other or none$3,0000.4%

PACs sponsored

  • L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PAC$1.6M raised this cycle
  • AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC PAC$96.4K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.