Federal contractor · MEDLEY, FL

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. received $5.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (−21% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $47.5M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($4.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$5.6M
New awards
12
Sole-source
0.7%
Single offer
99%
UEI
J79UJ96DGL31
Parent company
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA, LLC company family: 110 registered entities, $9.5B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. $5.4B
  2. $2.3B
  3. $1B
  4. $260.5M
  5. $175.6M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2MFY2017
  2. 1.9MFY2018
  3. 3.3MFY2019
  4. 5.5MFY2020
  5. 5.4MFY2021
  6. 4.1MFY2022
  7. 5.9MFY2023
  8. 6.7MFY2024
  9. 7.1MFY2025
  10. 5.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 2 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$5.3M94%
  2. IT & telecom$167.3K3.0%
  3. Professional services$103.8K1.9%
  4. Other equipment & supplies$41.5K0.7%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $5.6M
  • Sole-source awards0.7%
    US 30% · $41.5K
  • Single-offer competitions99%
    US 8.7% · $5.5M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· San Diego County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Sep 15, 2025 – Aug 20, 2026· 36C26225F0545
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs· Dallas County, TX· Equipment maintenance· Jun 4, 2020 – Jun 29, 2026· 36C25720F0234
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs· Kennebec County, ME· Equipment maintenance· Jun 21, 2023 – Jun 2, 2026· 36C24123F0208
  4. Department of the Air Force· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Equipment maintenance· Jan 31, 2022 – Jan 26, 2026· FA500022F0029
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Hamilton County, OH· Equipment maintenance· Jan 29, 2025 – Jan 31, 2026· 36C25025F0380
  6. National Park Service· Coconino County, AZ· Professional services· Mar 6, 2020 – Apr 1, 2026· 140P2120F0012
  7. National Park Service· Miami-Dade County, FL· Professional services· Aug 14, 2025 – Jul 17, 2026· 140P2125F0129
  8. Department of the Army· Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK· Equipment maintenance· Feb 19, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· W912D026FA055

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $2.4M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $403.1K paid out · $69.4K received
  • FY2023: $45.4K paid out · $68.8K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $44.4K received
  • FY2025: $105.5K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1,399 companies · $27.3B reported

  1. TUCSON, AZ · 123 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. TECHNICAL ASSURANCE, INC.$3.9B
    WILLOUGHBY, OH · 12 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. NEW ENGLAND AIRFOIL PRODUCTS INC$3.6B
    FARMINGTON, CT · 534 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing

Primes that pay it

111 companies · $21.3B reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 3,745 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. MELBOURNE, FL · 321 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1,563 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 151 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC$15.9B+5.6% in FY2026
    COLUMBUS, OH · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Facilities support services
  2. FREDERICK, MD · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Facilities support services
  3. UT-BATTELLE LLC$8B+3% in FY2026
    OAK RIDGE, TN · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA, LLC (110 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • HONEYWELL INTERNATIONALAI match · 100%
  • HONEYWELL AEROSPACE US LLCAI match · 99%
  • HoneywellAI match · 98%
Lobbying · 2025
$10.3M
57 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$32.5M
$32.5M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$1.8M
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$8.8M
    34 reports
  2. 2024$9.7M
    36 reports
  3. 2025$10.3M
    57 reports
  4. 2026$3.6M
    26 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense71 reports
  2. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code64 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations44 reports
  4. Trade (domestic and foreign)41 reports
  5. Energy and nuclear37 reports
  6. Aerospace34 reports
  7. Government issues27 reports
  8. Environment and Superfund20 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES143 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE133 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP$1.1M
    14 reports
  2. GUIDEPOSTSTRATEGIES, LLC$1.1M
    14 reports
  3. The Duberstein Group Inc.$1.1M
    13 reports
  4. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD$840K
    14 reports
  5. INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES, LLC$770K
    14 reports
  6. Capitol Tax Partners, LLP$720K
    13 reports
  7. Etherton and Associates, Inc.$460K
    14 reports
  8. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$450K
    6 reports

14 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$957.5K53%
  2. Democratic$845.5K47%
  3. Other or none$5,0000.3%

PACs sponsored

  • HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. TECHNOLOGIES PUBLIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL (HONPAC)$6.2M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.